Philip John Tyson

1.0k total citations
34 papers, 693 citations indexed

About

Philip John Tyson is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip John Tyson has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 693 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 11 papers in Clinical Psychology and 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Philip John Tyson's work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (11 papers), Physical Activity and Health (7 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers). Philip John Tyson is often cited by papers focused on Schizophrenia research and treatment (11 papers), Physical Activity and Health (7 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers). Philip John Tyson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Philip John Tyson's co-authors include Ann Mortimer, Keith R. Laws, Diane Crone, Kate Roberts, Kelly L. Wilson, Jessica Holley, Geoff P. Lovell, Nicky Lewis, Deborah Lancastle and David Biggs and has published in prestigious journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Psychiatry Research and The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Philip John Tyson

30 papers receiving 676 citations

Peers

Philip John Tyson
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 271
  • Clinical Psychology 183
  • Social Psychology 148
  • General Health Professions 141
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 117
Replace Katie L. Nugent with:
Katie L. Nugent United States
Tolga Binbay Türkiye
Maciej Kopera Poland
Patricia M. Beamish United States
Kate Briggs United Kingdom
Zack Z. Cernovsky Canada
Xiao‐Lan Cao China
Eva Cyhlarova United Kingdom
Marlous Tuithof Netherlands
Leah S. Richmond‐Rakerd United States
Katie L. Nugent United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Philip John Tyson
Philip John Tyson · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Philip John Tyson
Philip John Tyson · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Philip John Tyson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip John Tyson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip John Tyson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip John Tyson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip John Tyson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip John Tyson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip John Tyson. The network helps show where Philip John Tyson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip John Tyson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip John Tyson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip John Tyson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip John Tyson. Philip John Tyson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 2
3 4
4 59
5 4
6 34
7 9
8 2
9 53
10 110
11 84
12 34
13 23
14 39
15 64
16 4
17 13
18 2
19 43
20 10

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026