Deborah Harrop

879 citations
31 papers · 576 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Deborah Harrop

29 papers receiving 562 citations

Peers

Deborah Harrop
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Family Practice 43
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 76
  • Library and Information Sciences 18
  • Clinical Psychology 116
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 67
Replace Cheri Smith with:
Cheri Smith United States
Takashi Arao Japan
Chris Walker United States
Lori W. Turner United States
Marit A.C. Tanke Netherlands
Jocelyn Charles Canada
Kasper Olesen Denmark
Marina Maffoni Italy
Jay E. Earles United States
Siobhan McCann United Kingdom
Deborah Harrop relative to Cheri Smith United States Cheri Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Cheri Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Harrop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Harrop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Harrop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Harrop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Harrop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Harrop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Harrop. The network helps show where Deborah Harrop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Harrop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Harrop Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Harrop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2 20236
3 202210
4 20228
5 202127
6 202125
7 20202
8 20203
9 202016
10 20204
11 202018
12 201914
13 201915
14 201997
15
MANAGING NON-SPECIFIC NECK PAIN: A NATIONAL SURVEY OF CURRENT UK PHYSIOTHERAPY PRACTICE
20182
16 201726
17 201611
18 20151
19 201511
20
Factors predicting admission to institutional care among intermediate care service users
20151

About Deborah Harrop

Deborah Harrop is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Occupational Therapy, Family Practice, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 31 papers that have together received 576 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers) and Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (43 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (76 citations), Library and Information Sciences (18 citations), Clinical Psychology (116 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (67 citations). Deborah Harrop has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Sally Fowler‐Davis, Ali Ali, Helen Watson, Andrew W. Young, Elizabeth Walton, Hora Soltani, Helen Crank, Robert Copeland, Emma Everson-Hock and Helen Quirk. Their work appears in journals such as Physiotherapy, Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, Systematic Reviews, PLoS ONE and International Journal of Mental Health Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026