Deborah Foster

747 total citations
26 papers, 521 citations indexed

About

Deborah Foster is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah Foster has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 521 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Public Administration, 7 papers in General Health Professions and 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Deborah Foster's work include Labor Movements and Unions (11 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (6 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (6 papers). Deborah Foster is often cited by papers focused on Labor Movements and Unions (11 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (6 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (6 papers). Deborah Foster collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Estonia. Deborah Foster's co-authors include Victoria Wass, Patricia Fosh, Paul Hoggett, Peter Scott, Melissa M. Melough, Amanda M. Fretts, Sheela Sathyanarayana, Marie A. Brault, Toan Ha and Stephen L. Schensul and has published in prestigious journals such as Nutrients, The International Journal of Human Resource Management and Sociology.

In The Last Decade

Deborah Foster

24 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers

Deborah Foster
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • General Health Professions 174
  • Public Administration 164
  • Sociology and Political Science 142
  • Safety Research 124
  • Demography 116
Replace Sarah Carnochan with:
Sarah Carnochan United States
Steven G. Anderson United States
Danièle Meulders Belgium
Sian Moore United Kingdom
Mark Williams United Kingdom
Dan Finn United Kingdom
Síle Pádraigín O'Dorchai Belgium
Karen Christensen Norway
Hanne Marlene Dahl Denmark
Michael Tåhlin Sweden
Sarah Carnochan United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Deborah Foster
Deborah Foster · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Deborah Foster
Deborah Foster · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Foster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Foster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Foster. The network helps show where Deborah Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Foster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Foster. Deborah Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2
Legally disabled? The impact of Covid-19 on the employment and training of disabled lawyers in England and Wales: opportunities for job-redesign and best practice
1
3 11
4 3
5 2
6 13
7 19
8 8
9
The contribution of gender theory to investigating disability and professional work
2
10 9
11 124
12 15
13 1
14 1
15 85
16 5
17 50
18 3
19 18
20 15

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026