Daniel J. Pesut

1.9k total citations
83 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Daniel J. Pesut is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Education and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel J. Pesut has authored 83 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Clinical Psychology, 13 papers in Education and 12 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Daniel J. Pesut's work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (9 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (7 papers) and Nursing education and management (6 papers). Daniel J. Pesut is often cited by papers focused on Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (9 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (7 papers) and Nursing education and management (6 papers). Daniel J. Pesut collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Morocco. Daniel J. Pesut's co-authors include JoAnne Herman, RuthAnne Kuiper, Donald D. Kautz, Judith A. Effken, Thomas R. Clancy, Carol A. Williams, Mary L. Fisher, Constance M. Baker, Anna M. McDaniel and Sally Brosz Hardin and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Journal of Nursing Scholarship.

In The Last Decade

Daniel J. Pesut

76 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel J. Pesut United States 20 420 386 287 212 187 83 1.4k
Pamela M. Ironside United States 20 502 1.2× 410 1.1× 376 1.3× 141 0.7× 342 1.8× 48 1.4k
Diane M. Billings United States 19 932 2.2× 334 0.9× 472 1.6× 59 0.3× 302 1.6× 79 1.7k
Michelle Kelly Australia 25 340 0.8× 446 1.2× 537 1.9× 127 0.6× 744 4.0× 85 1.8k
Jennie C. De Gagné United States 24 383 0.9× 465 1.2× 315 1.1× 197 0.9× 258 1.4× 122 1.6k
R Davidhizar United States 21 212 0.5× 661 1.7× 311 1.1× 354 1.7× 104 0.6× 289 2.0k
Charlotte Silén Sweden 20 473 1.1× 374 1.0× 522 1.8× 82 0.4× 139 0.7× 66 1.5k
Håkan Hult Sweden 23 518 1.2× 416 1.1× 779 2.7× 92 0.4× 384 2.1× 77 1.7k
Åshild Slettebø Norway 30 256 0.6× 1.0k 2.6× 936 3.3× 453 2.1× 250 1.3× 113 2.2k
Dolly Goldenberg Canada 18 255 0.6× 438 1.1× 217 0.8× 83 0.4× 174 0.9× 38 1.0k
Pam Moule United Kingdom 19 353 0.8× 293 0.8× 236 0.8× 81 0.4× 182 1.0× 67 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Pesut

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Pesut's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Pesut with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Pesut more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Pesut

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Pesut. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Pesut. The network helps show where Daniel J. Pesut may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel J. Pesut

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel J. Pesut. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel J. Pesut based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel J. Pesut. Daniel J. Pesut is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Anderson, Cindy M., Daniel J. Pesut, Carmen Alvarez, et al.. (2023). Nurse scholars of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program. Nursing Outlook. 71(5). 102027–102027. 1 indexed citations
2.
Brody, Abraham A., Jason E. Farley, Gordon Lee Gillespie, et al.. (2017). Diversity dynamics: The experience of male Robert Wood Johnson Foundation nurse faculty scholars. Nursing Outlook. 65(3). 278–288. 20 indexed citations
3.
Gillespie, Gordon Lee, C. Ann Gakumo, Diane Von Ah, et al.. (2017). A summative evaluation of productivity and accomplishments of Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholars Program participants. Journal of Professional Nursing. 34(4). 289–295. 8 indexed citations
4.
Broome, Marion E., et al.. (2011). Evaluating the Outcomes of a Distance-Accessible PhD Program. Journal of Professional Nursing. 27(2). 69–77. 21 indexed citations
5.
Jones, Josette, K Schilling, & Daniel J. Pesut. (2011). Barriers and Benefits Associated with Nurses Information Seeking Related to Patient Education Needs on Clinical Nursing Units. The Open Nursing Journal. 5(1). 24–30. 33 indexed citations
6.
Clancy, Thomas R., Judith A. Effken, & Daniel J. Pesut. (2008). Applications of complex systems theory in nursing education, research, and practice. Nursing Outlook. 56(5). 248–256.e3. 53 indexed citations
7.
Horton‐Deutsch, Sara, et al.. (2007). Appreciative Inquiry for Leading in Complex Systems: Supporting the Transformation of Academic Nursing Culture. Journal of Nursing Education. 46(7). 319–324. 31 indexed citations
8.
Kautz, Donald D., RuthAnne Kuiper, Daniel J. Pesut, & Randy Lee Williams. (2006). Using NANDA, NIC, and NOC (NNN) Language for Clinical Reasoning With the Outcome‐Present State‐Test (OPT) Model. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 17(3). 129–138. 29 indexed citations
9.
Kautz, Donald D., et al.. (2005). Promoting Clinical Reasoning in Undergraduate Nursing Students: Application and Evaluation of the Outcome Present State Test (OPT) Model of Clinical Reasoning. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. 2(1). 120 indexed citations
10.
Pesut, Daniel J.. (2004). Create the future through renewal.. PubMed. 30(1). 24–5, 56. 2 indexed citations
11.
Pesut, Daniel J., et al.. (2004). Promoting cognitive and metacognitive reflective reasoning skills in nursing practice: self‐regulated learning theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 45(4). 381–391. 275 indexed citations
12.
Pesut, Daniel J.. (2001). Deep change. Nursing Outlook. 49(3). 118–118. 1 indexed citations
13.
Pesut, Daniel J.. (2000). Knowledge-Work for 21st Century Nursing. Nursing Outlook. 48(2). 57–57. 2 indexed citations
14.
Pesut, Daniel J.. (1999). Building on the past to create nursing's future. Nursing Outlook. 47(3). 107–107.
15.
Pesut, Daniel J.. (1998). Twenty-first century learning. Nursing Outlook. 46(1). 37–37. 6 indexed citations
16.
Grant, Susan, et al.. (1997). Psychological Evaluations, Referrals, and Follow‐up of Adolescents After Their Exposure to Hurricane Hugo. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing. 10(1). 7–16. 15 indexed citations
17.
Pesut, Daniel J., et al.. (1994). Using Metacognitive Skills: The Quality Audit Tool. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 5(2). 56–64. 6 indexed citations
18.
Pesut, Daniel J. & JoAnne Herman. (1992). Metacognitive Skills in Diagnostic Reasoning: Making the Implicit Explicit. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 3(4). 148–154. 26 indexed citations
19.
Pesut, Daniel J.. (1989). AIM versus BLAME: Using an Outcome Spefication Model. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services. 27(5). 26–30. 3 indexed citations
20.
Pesut, Daniel J.. (1984). Metacognition: the Self-Regulation of Creative Thought in Nursing.. Deep Blue (University of Michigan). 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026