Caitlin Pike

479 total citations
25 papers, 279 citations indexed

About

Caitlin Pike is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and Occupational Therapy. According to data from OpenAlex, Caitlin Pike has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 279 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 5 papers in Surgery and 5 papers in Occupational Therapy. Recurrent topics in Caitlin Pike's work include Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (4 papers), Phytoestrogen effects and research (3 papers) and Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (3 papers). Caitlin Pike is often cited by papers focused on Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (4 papers), Phytoestrogen effects and research (3 papers) and Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (3 papers). Caitlin Pike collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Caitlin Pike's co-authors include Deborah Cullen, Carol Shieh, Susan J. Pressler, Alta Kritzinger, Rebecca J. Bartlett Ellis, Ukamaka M. Oruche, Mitchell R. Knisely, Joyce Pittman, Susan M. McLennon and Janet Ramundo and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Obesity Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Caitlin Pike

24 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Caitlin Pike United States 12 59 56 47 35 33 25 279
Hongxia Guo China 11 81 1.4× 101 1.8× 78 1.7× 22 0.6× 36 1.1× 22 330
Chris Sampson United Kingdom 13 78 1.3× 22 0.4× 13 0.3× 30 0.9× 13 0.4× 31 331
Ebru Gözüyeşil Türkiye 10 43 0.7× 71 1.3× 30 0.6× 33 0.9× 25 0.8× 48 270
Vishnu Renjith India 7 91 1.5× 86 1.5× 12 0.3× 87 2.5× 12 0.4× 32 379
Tara Beatty United States 8 103 1.7× 82 1.5× 14 0.3× 120 3.4× 21 0.6× 14 454
Upul Senarath Sri Lanka 13 122 2.1× 95 1.7× 37 0.8× 35 1.0× 24 0.7× 39 411
Robin Chatters United Kingdom 9 98 1.7× 45 0.8× 10 0.2× 40 1.1× 28 0.8× 22 294
Dálete Delalibera Corrêa de Faria Mota Brazil 11 45 0.8× 104 1.9× 9 0.2× 12 0.3× 26 0.8× 31 311
Joel Stocker Taiwan 10 75 1.3× 135 2.4× 76 1.6× 47 1.3× 22 0.7× 21 313
Vahid Alinejad Iran 9 37 0.6× 37 0.7× 6 0.1× 42 1.2× 12 0.4× 58 253

Countries citing papers authored by Caitlin Pike

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caitlin Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caitlin Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caitlin Pike more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caitlin Pike

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caitlin Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caitlin Pike. The network helps show where Caitlin Pike may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caitlin Pike

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caitlin Pike. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caitlin Pike based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caitlin Pike. Caitlin Pike is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pike, Caitlin & Bárbara S. Lancho-Barrantes. (2025). Libraries as research enablers: A content analysis of research excellence framework environment statements. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 51(3). 103039–103039. 1 indexed citations
2.
Sheng, Ying, et al.. (2021). Review of menopausal palpitations measures. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(1). 5–5. 9 indexed citations
3.
Halstead, Judith A., et al.. (2020). Developing interprofessional collaborative practice competencies in rural primary health care teams. Nursing Outlook. 69(3). 447–457. 12 indexed citations
4.
Pike, Caitlin, et al.. (2020). Individualized approach to primary prevention of substance use disorder: age-related risks. Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy. 15(1). 58–58. 19 indexed citations
5.
Ramundo, Janet, Caitlin Pike, & Joyce Pittman. (2018). Do Prophylactic Foam Dressings Reduce Heel Pressure Injuries?. Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing. 45(1). 75–82. 12 indexed citations
6.
Pike, Caitlin, et al.. (2018). Does the Use of Clean or Sterile Dressing Technique Affect the Incidence of Wound Infection?. Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing. 45(3). 265–269. 10 indexed citations
7.
Pike, Caitlin, et al.. (2018). Upskilling the promotion and tenure process: Training administrators for responsible use of research impact metrics. IUScholarWorks (Indiana University).
8.
Cullen, Deborah, et al.. (2017). Mentoring Nontenured Track Nursing Faculty. Nurse Educator. 42(6). 290–294. 27 indexed citations
9.
Pike, Caitlin, et al.. (2017). Social participation in working-age adults with aphasia: an updated systematic review. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 24(8). 627–639. 24 indexed citations
10.
Pike, Caitlin, et al.. (2017). Do Intra-anal Bowel Management Devices Reduce Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis and/or Pressure Injuries?. Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing. 44(6). 583–588. 4 indexed citations
11.
Ellis, Rebecca J. Bartlett, et al.. (2017). Pillbox intervention fidelity in medication adherence research: A systematic review. Nursing Outlook. 65(4). 464–476. 14 indexed citations
12.
Pike, Caitlin, et al.. (2017). Does Incremental Positioning (Weight Shifts) Reduce Pressure Injuries in Critical Care Patients?. Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing. 44(4). 319–323. 12 indexed citations
13.
Hudmon, Karen Suchanek, et al.. (2017). Impact of Tobacco Quitlines on Smoking Cessation in Persons With Mental Illness: A Systematic Review. Journal of Drug Education. 47(1-2). 68–81. 10 indexed citations
14.
Ellis, Rebecca J. Bartlett, et al.. (2016). A review of immediacy and implications for provider–patient relationships to support medication management. Patient Preference and Adherence. 10. 9–9. 13 indexed citations
15.
Ellis, Rebecca J. Bartlett, et al.. (2016). A review of immediacy and implications for provider–patient relationships to support medication management. 4 indexed citations
16.
Pike, Caitlin, et al.. (2016). Risk profiles of infants ≥32 weeks’ gestational age with oropharyngeal and oesophageal dysphagia in neonatal care. South African Journal of Child Health. 10(2). 130–130. 5 indexed citations
17.
Pike, Caitlin, et al.. (2016). CA-MRSA Decolonization Strategies. Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing. 43(6). 577–582. 12 indexed citations
18.
Alpi, Kristine M., et al.. (2016). Access to human, animal, and environmental journals is still limited for the One Health community. Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA. 104(2). 100–108. 3 indexed citations
19.
Pike, Caitlin. (2015). Hunting for Knowledge: Using a Scavenger Hunt to Orient Graduate Veterinary Students. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. 2015(81). 3 indexed citations
20.
McKenzie, S A & Caitlin Pike. (1987). PORTABLE UNIT FOR NURSING INFANTS IN THE PRONE POSITION. The Lancet. 329(8538). 895–896. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026