Deborah Carper
Impact in
- Cell Biology top 1%
- Aldose Reductase and Taurine
- Clinical Biochemistry top 2%
- Advanced Glycation End Products research
Papers in
- Cell Biology 29
- Aldose Reductase and Taurine 28
-
- Advanced Glycation End Products research 9
- Co-authors
- Thomas C. HohmanChihiro NishimuraJin H. KinoshitaPeter F. KadorCharles N. SerhanChatarina LöfqvistEmily Y. ChewLois E. H. Smith
- Journals
- Experimental Eye Research (13 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (5 papers)Advances in experimental medicine and biology (3 papers)Current Eye Research (3 papers)Ophthalmic Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaJapan
In The Last Decade
Deborah Carper
60 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Cell Biology 866
- Clinical Biochemistry 241
- Ophthalmology 297
- Biochemistry 206
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 429
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Carper
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Carper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Carper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Carper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Carper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Carper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Carper. The network helps show where Deborah Carper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Carper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 33 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 41 | |
| 3 | Increased dietary intake of ω-3-polyunsaturated fatty acids reduces pathological retinal angiogenesis Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 553 |
| 4 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 14 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 59 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 21 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 34 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 36 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 33 | |
| 18 | 1990 | 19 | |
| 19 | 1990 | 25 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 74 |
About Deborah Carper
Deborah Carper is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Clinical Biochemistry, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Physiology and Equine, having authored 61 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aldose Reductase and Taurine (28 papers), Connexins and lens biology (23 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (14 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (13 papers), Advanced Glycation End Products research (9 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (7 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (5 papers) and Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (866 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (241 citations), Ophthalmology (297 citations), Biochemistry (206 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (429 citations). Deborah Carper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Thomas C. Hohman, Chihiro Nishimura, Jin H. Kinoshita, Peter F. Kador, Charles N. Serhan, Chatarina Löfqvist, Emily Y. Chew, Lois E. H. Smith, Jing Chen and Jing X. Kang. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Eye Research, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Advances in experimental medicine and biology, Current Eye Research and Ophthalmic Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.