Ophthalmic Research

3.1k papers and 40.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.1k papers published in Ophthalmic Research in the last decades have received a total of 40.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Ophthalmic Research usually cover Ophthalmology (1.7k papers), Molecular Biology (1.1k papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Glaucoma and retinal disorders (773 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (739 papers) and Connexins and lens biology (557 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ophthalmic Research are Roger J.W. Truscott, Christophe Delaey, Johan Van de Voorde, Jost B. Jonas, O. Hockwin, Rolf Eckmiller, George C.Y. Chiou, Sidney Lerman, Richard H. W. Funk and Ralf Dahm.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ophthalmic Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ophthalmic Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ophthalmic Research.

Countries where authors publish in Ophthalmic Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ophthalmic Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ophthalmic Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ophthalmic Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025