Experimental Eye Research

11.1k papers and 309.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 11.1k papers published in Experimental Eye Research in the last decades have received a total of 309.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Experimental Eye Research usually cover Molecular Biology (6.3k papers), Ophthalmology (4.3k papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.7k papers) specifically the topics of Retinal Development and Disorders (2.5k papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2.4k papers) and Connexins and lens biology (2.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Experimental Eye Research are Anders Bill, Steven E. Wilson, Roger J.W. Truscott, Abraham Spector, D.M. Maurice, Joseph Horwitz, Venkat N. Reddy, Ernst R. Tamm, Ramesh C. Tripathi and G. Duncan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Experimental Eye Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Experimental Eye Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Experimental Eye Research.

Countries where authors publish in Experimental Eye Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Experimental Eye Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Experimental Eye Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Experimental Eye Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025