David Woodliff

2.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
47 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

David Woodliff is a scholar working on Accounting, Management Information Systems and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, David Woodliff has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Accounting, 8 papers in Management Information Systems and 8 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in David Woodliff's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (23 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (13 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (8 papers). David Woodliff is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (23 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (13 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (8 papers). David Woodliff collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. David Woodliff's co-authors include John Watson, Gary S. Monroe, Paul Coram, Juliana Ng, R.A. Newby, Keith A. Houghton, Michael E. Bradbury, Philip Brown, Raymond da Silva Rosa and Phil Hancock and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice and Management Accounting Research.

In The Last Decade

David Woodliff

45 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

Corporate Governance Qual... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Woodliff Australia 17 1.0k 698 251 188 170 47 1.6k
L.H.H. Bollen Netherlands 18 552 0.5× 864 1.2× 164 0.7× 315 1.7× 125 0.7× 27 1.5k
Philomena Leung Australia 23 737 0.7× 513 0.7× 199 0.8× 233 1.2× 96 0.6× 51 1.5k
Dimitrios Maditinos Greece 15 357 0.3× 640 0.9× 195 0.8× 135 0.7× 161 0.9× 45 1.3k
Mandy M. Cheng Australia 15 883 0.9× 624 0.9× 157 0.6× 342 1.8× 283 1.7× 38 1.4k
Jared D. Harris United States 11 540 0.5× 563 0.8× 142 0.6× 76 0.4× 308 1.8× 32 1.3k
Stella Fearnley United Kingdom 19 1.6k 1.6× 744 1.1× 183 0.7× 390 2.1× 118 0.7× 43 2.1k
Dan L. Worrell United States 20 654 0.6× 763 1.1× 407 1.6× 92 0.5× 430 2.5× 42 1.7k
Randal J. Elder United States 22 1.3k 1.3× 727 1.0× 93 0.4× 214 1.1× 124 0.7× 74 1.8k
Clara Xiaoling Chen United States 18 1.1k 1.1× 684 1.0× 120 0.5× 477 2.5× 288 1.7× 48 2.0k
Douglas A. Bosse United States 15 375 0.4× 683 1.0× 206 0.8× 123 0.7× 320 1.9× 24 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by David Woodliff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Woodliff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Woodliff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Woodliff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Woodliff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Woodliff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Woodliff. The network helps show where David Woodliff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Woodliff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Woodliff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Woodliff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Woodliff. David Woodliff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chong, Vincent K., et al.. (2024). The effects of performance-based profit-sharing schemes and client pressure on auditors' pre-negotiation judgments. Advances in Accounting. 68. 100781–100781. 1 indexed citations
2.
Woodliff, David, et al.. (2021). External auditors' reliance on management's experts: The effects of an early‐stage conversation and past auditor–client relationship. International Journal of Auditing. 25(1). 166–187. 2 indexed citations
3.
Woodliff, David, et al.. (2020). External auditors' evaluation of a management's expert's credibility: Evidence from Australia. International Journal of Auditing. 24(1). 90–109. 6 indexed citations
4.
Watson, John, et al.. (2013). Corporate Governance Quality and CSR Disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics. 125(1). 59–73. 368 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Singh, Harjinder, David Woodliff, Nigar Sultana, & R.A. Newby. (2013). Additional Evidence on the Relationship between an Internal Audit Function and External Audit Fees in Australia. International Journal of Auditing. 18(1). 27–39. 14 indexed citations
6.
Woodliff, David, et al.. (2010). The impact of cumulative pressure on accounting students’ propensity to commit plagiarism: an experimental approach. Accounting and Finance. 51(4). 985–1005. 27 indexed citations
7.
Coram, Paul, Gary S. Monroe, & David Woodliff. (2009). The Value of Assurance on Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure: An Experimental Evaluation. Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory. 28(1). 137–151. 157 indexed citations
8.
Coram, Paul, et al.. (2008). The Moral Intensity of Reduced Audit Quality Acts. Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory. 27(1). 127–149. 83 indexed citations
9.
Woodliff, David, et al.. (2007). Managerial Incentives and the Treatment of Pre-production Expenditure in the Mining Industry. International Journal of Business. 15(1). 127–152. 3 indexed citations
10.
Brown, Philip, et al.. (2007). Identifying Decision Useful Information With the Matrix Format Income Statement. SSRN Electronic Journal. 15 indexed citations
11.
Hancock, Phil, et al.. (2006). Identifying Decision Useful Information With the Matrix Format Income Statement (1). UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia). 3 indexed citations
12.
Rosa, Raymond da Silva, Robin John Limmack, & David Woodliff. (2004). The Equity Wealth Effects of Method of Payment in Takeover Bids for Privately Held Firms. Australian Journal of Management. 29(1_suppl). 93–110. 17 indexed citations
13.
Newby, R.A., John Watson, & David Woodliff. (2003). Using Focus Groups in SME Research : The Case of Owner-Operator Objectives. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. 8(3). 237–246. 19 indexed citations
14.
Newby, R.A., John Watson, & David Woodliff. (2003). Describing the Entrepreneur: How Appropriate is the Founder/Non-Founder Dichotomy?. UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia). 3 indexed citations
15.
Watson, John, R.A. Newby, & David Woodliff. (2002). Measuring Quality of Working Life for the Self-employed: Development of an Instrument. Prehospital Emergency Care. 7(2). 219–24. 1 indexed citations
16.
Helliar, Christine, et al.. (1996). UK Auditors' Perceptions of Inherent Risk. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
17.
Helliar, Christine, et al.. (1996). UK AUDITORS' PERCEPTIONS OF INHERENT RISK. The British Accounting Review. 28(1). 45–72. 19 indexed citations
18.
Monroe, Gary S. & David Woodliff. (1994). GreatExpectations: PublicPerceptionsOfTheAuditor'sRole. Australian Accounting Review. 4(8). 42–53. 9 indexed citations
19.
Houghton, Keith A., et al.. (1994). Audit Fees:. Managerial Auditing Journal. 9(7). 3–11. 40 indexed citations
20.
Woodliff, David, et al.. (1994). Predicting Corporate Failure Using Publicly Available Information. Australian Accounting Review. 4(7). 13–27. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026