Robert F. Gleckner
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History top 5%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Anthropology
- Co-authors
- David V. ErdmanBernard BeattyLeopold DamroschMark GreenbergDavid WyattV. de S. PintoCarlos Baker
- Topics
- Moravian Church and William Blake (15 papers)Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (4 papers)Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Robert F. Gleckner
17 papers receiving 76 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Literature and Literary Theory 104
- Sociology and Political Science 38
- History 30
- Philosophy 23
- Anthropology 22
Countries citing papers authored by Robert F. Gleckner
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert F. Gleckner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert F. Gleckner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert F. Gleckner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert F. Gleckner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert F. Gleckner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert F. Gleckner. The network helps show where Robert F. Gleckner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert F. Gleckner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert F. Gleckner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert F. Gleckner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert F. Gleckner. Robert F. Gleckner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Romanticism and the Self-Annihilation of Language | 0 |
| 2 | The plays of Lord Byron : critical essays | 4 |
| 3 | Critical essays on Lord Byron | 2 |
| 4 | Approaches to teaching Blake's Songs of innocence and of experience | 3 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | Blake's Little Black Boy and the Bible | 1 |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | Romanticism : points of view | 25 |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | The Piper & the bard : a study of William Blake | 1 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 50 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Robert F. Gleckner
Robert F. Gleckner is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Anthropology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 153 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Moravian Church and William Blake (15 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (4 papers) and Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (104 citations), Religious studies (16 citations) and History (30 citations). Robert F. Gleckner has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David V. Erdman, Bernard Beatty, Leopold Damrosch, Mark Greenberg, David Wyatt, V. de S. Pinto and Carlos Baker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, The Modern Language Review and American Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.