Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of William Blake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Blake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Blake more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Blake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Blake. The network helps show where William Blake may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Blake
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Blake.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Blake based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William Blake. William Blake is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Walsh, R. P. D., et al.. (2017). Messages, limitations and future needs of research into environmental impacts and mitigating and remediation measures of oil palm and forest land-use and land management in SE Asia. EGUGA. 18107.1 indexed citations
12.
Blake, William, et al.. (2015). Quantifying variation in 7Be depth distribution under simulated rainfall for an increased understanding of fallout radionuclide use in erosion assessments. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 17. 22–23.1 indexed citations
13.
Blake, William, et al.. (2008). Blake's poetry and designs : illuminated works other writings criticism.1 indexed citations
14.
Blake, William, Peter Wallbrink, Stefan H. Doerr, et al.. (2006). Using geochemical stratigraphy to indicate post-fire sediment and nutrient fluxes into water supply reservoir, Sydney, Australia. IAHS-AISH publication. 363–370.9 indexed citations
15.
Blake, William, Peter Wallbrink, Stefan H. Doerr, Richard A. Shakesby, & G. S. Humphreys. (2004). 159. Sediment Redistribution Following Wildfire in the Sydney Region, Australia: A Mineral Magnetic Tracing Approach. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 15(2). 52–52.1 indexed citations
16.
Blake, William, Ian G. Droppo, Stefan H. Doerr, et al.. (2004). Modification of soil aggregates during burning: implications for post-fire sediment redistribution. European geosciences union general assembly.1 indexed citations
17.
Blake, William, et al.. (1979). Blake's poetry and designs : authoritative texts, illuminations in color and monochrome, related prose, criticism.2 indexed citations
18.
Blake, William, Walter Scott, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, et al.. (1975). Поэзия английского романтизма.1 indexed citations
19.
Blake, William & Geoffrey Keynes. (1966). Complete writings : with variant readings. Oxford University Press eBooks.13 indexed citations
20.
Blake, William, et al.. (1957). William Blake : water-color drawings, 1757-1827.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.