Restoration Ecology

3.6k papers and 102.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.6k papers published in Restoration Ecology in the last decades have received a total of 102.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Restoration Ecology usually cover Ecology (2.1k papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.0k papers) and Global and Planetary Change (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (1.6k papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (787 papers) and Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (453 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Restoration Ecology are Richard J. Hobbs, James Aronson, Karen D. Holl, T. Mitchell Aide, Karel Prach, J. Arthur Harris, Kingsley W. Dixon, David A. Norton, Margaret A. Palmer and John M. Koch.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Restoration Ecology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Restoration Ecology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Restoration Ecology.

Countries where authors publish in Restoration Ecology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Restoration Ecology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Restoration Ecology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Restoration Ecology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025