Journal of Vegetation Science

4.1k papers and 176.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.1k papers published in Journal of Vegetation Science in the last decades have received a total of 176.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Vegetation Science usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.2k papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.4k papers) and Plant Science (1.4k papers) specifically the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3.0k papers), Plant and animal studies (924 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (810 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Vegetation Science are Philip M. Dixon, Lubomír Tichý, Paul A. Keddy, Zoltán Botta‐Dukát, Milan Chytrý, Bruce McCune, Rune Halvorsen Økland, Juli G. Pausas, Eddy van der Maarel and J. Bastow Wilson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Vegetation Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Vegetation Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Vegetation Science.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Vegetation Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Vegetation Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Vegetation Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Vegetation Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025