Control Engineering Practice

179.2k citations
5.4k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Fault Detection and Control Systems
    • Advanced Control Systems Optimization
    • Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
    • Control Systems and Identification
    • Iterative Learning Control Systems
    • Advanced Control Systems Design
    • Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems

Papers in

    • Fault Detection and Control Systems 1.1k
    • Advanced Control Systems Optimization 1.0k
    • Control Systems and Identification 525
    • Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems 505
    • Iterative Learning Control Systems 454
    • Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems 314

Control Engineering Practice

5.0k papers receiving 152.3k citations

Peers

Control Engineering Practice
Comparison fields: 5 of 230
  • Control and Systems Engineering 103.4k
  • Automotive Engineering 20.9k
  • Mechanical Engineering 35.4k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 5.0k
  • Aerospace Engineering 15.6k
Replace IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology with:
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology United States
Measurement China
Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control United States
Mathematical Problems in Engineering China
Nonlinear Dynamics China
IFAC-PapersOnLine France
Applied Mathematical Modelling China
International Journal of Control United States
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence China
Ocean Engineering China
Control Engineering Practice relative to IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology United States IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Control Engineering Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Control Engineering Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Control Engineering Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Control Engineering Practice more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Control Engineering Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Control Engineering Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Control Engineering Practice.

About Control Engineering Practice

The 5.4k papers published in Control Engineering Practice in the last decades have received a total of 179.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Control Engineering Practice usually cover Control and Systems Engineering (3.5k papers), Automotive Engineering (610 papers), Mechanical Engineering (1.3k papers), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (173 papers) and Hardware and Architecture (156 papers) specifically the topics of Fault Detection and Control Systems (1.1k papers), Advanced Control Systems Optimization (1.0k papers), Control Systems and Identification (525 papers), Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems (505 papers), Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems (472 papers), Iterative Learning Control Systems (454 papers), Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems (314 papers) and Mineral Processing and Grinding (238 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Control Engineering Practice are Steven C. Rogers, Kislaya Prasad, Ryszard Tadeusiewicz, Tadeusz Kaczorek, S. Joe Qin, Thomas A. Badgwell, Witold Pedrycz, Torsten Knohl, Rolf Isermann and Tore Hägglund.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact