David T. Morse

402 total citations
33 papers, 295 citations indexed

About

David T. Morse is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, David T. Morse has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 295 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 10 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 7 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in David T. Morse's work include Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (9 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (7 papers) and Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (7 papers). David T. Morse is often cited by papers focused on Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (9 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (7 papers) and Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (7 papers). David T. Morse collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and Germany. David T. Morse's co-authors include Joe Khatena, Gregg A. Johns, Angela A. Robertson, Janet S. St. Lawrence, William G. Masten, Tisha Wiley, Gail A. Wasserman, Jennifer E. Becan, Hannah K. Knudsen and Carl Leukefeld and has published in prestigious journals such as Educational and Psychological Measurement, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors and Health Education & Behavior.

In The Last Decade

David T. Morse

27 papers receiving 260 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David T. Morse United States 10 83 49 45 44 44 33 295
Ding‐Hau Huang Taiwan 11 60 0.7× 45 0.9× 28 0.6× 71 1.6× 98 2.2× 19 266
Andrew Preston United Kingdom 10 40 0.5× 25 0.5× 58 1.3× 56 1.3× 60 1.4× 19 339
Carla M. Teixeira Portugal 9 69 0.8× 51 1.0× 30 0.7× 128 2.9× 126 2.9× 40 407
Eduardo José Fernández Ozcorta Spain 11 49 0.6× 39 0.8× 26 0.6× 103 2.3× 39 0.9× 47 288
Karen Williams United States 8 86 1.0× 31 0.6× 64 1.4× 30 0.7× 46 1.0× 19 290
José Tavares Portugal 8 162 2.0× 46 0.9× 25 0.6× 42 1.0× 70 1.6× 34 362
Paul Hagler Canada 12 66 0.8× 121 2.5× 70 1.6× 17 0.4× 93 2.1× 17 384
Helene S. Wallach Israel 10 145 1.7× 36 0.7× 26 0.6× 139 3.2× 113 2.6× 15 447
Ma Dolores Vara Spain 10 65 0.8× 42 0.9× 19 0.4× 64 1.5× 144 3.3× 25 299
Mike Huiskes Netherlands 11 112 1.3× 40 0.8× 58 1.3× 26 0.6× 18 0.4× 36 301

Countries citing papers authored by David T. Morse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David T. Morse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David T. Morse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David T. Morse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David T. Morse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David T. Morse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David T. Morse. The network helps show where David T. Morse may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David T. Morse

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David T. Morse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David T. Morse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David T. Morse. David T. Morse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Holden, Chelsey L., et al.. (2019). Understanding Non-Technical Competencies: Compassion and Communication among Fourth-Year Veterinarians-in-Training. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education. 46(4). 506–517. 9 indexed citations
2.
Knight, Danica K., George W. Joe, David T. Morse, et al.. (2018). Organizational Context and Individual Adaptability in Promoting Perceived Importance and Use of Best Practices for Substance Use. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 46(2). 192–216. 20 indexed citations
3.
Robertson, Angela A., et al.. (2017). Measuring Alcohol Marketing Engagement: The Development and Psychometric Properties of the Alcohol Marketing Engagement Scale.. PubMed. 18(1). 87–99. 2 indexed citations
4.
Morse, David T. & Angela A. Robertson. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Short Inventory of Problems (SIP) with adjudicated DUI intervention participants.. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 31(1). 110–116. 4 indexed citations
5.
Morse, David T.. (2014). Learning Styles: Psychology Shouldn’t Condone Mythology. 1(2). 1 indexed citations
6.
Morse, David T., et al.. (2013). Self-Efficacy, Test Anxiety, and Self-Reported Test-Taking Ability: How Do They Differ between High- and Low-Achieving Students?.. Research in the schools. 20(2). 28–34.
7.
Morse, David T., et al.. (2011). A prominent feature analysis of seventh-grade writing. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 4(1).
8.
Robertson, Angela A., et al.. (2009). Hurricane Katrina's impact on the mental health of adolescent female offenders. Anxiety Stress & Coping. 22(4). 433–448. 10 indexed citations
9.
Jacquin, Kristine M., et al.. (2003). A Validity Study of the Positive Psychology Protective Profile. Psychological Reports. 93(2). 441–447. 1 indexed citations
10.
Johns, Gregg A., et al.. (2001). An Analysis of Early vs. Later Responses on a Divergent Production Task Across Three Time Press Conditions. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 35(1). 65–72. 18 indexed citations
11.
Morse, David T., et al.. (2001). Do Time Press, Stimulus, and Creative Prompt Influence the Divergent Production of Undergraduate Students? Yes, Yes, and No, Not Very Much. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 35(2). 102–114. 14 indexed citations
12.
Johns, Gregg A., et al.. (2000). Divergent production in gifted adolescents using timed vs. untimed stimuli with creative prompting. Roeper Review. 22(3). 165–166. 11 indexed citations
13.
Morse, David T.. (1998). The Relative Difficulty of Selected Test-Wiseness Skills among College Students. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 58(3). 399–408. 7 indexed citations
14.
Khatena, Joe, et al.. (1993). Repeated Presentation of Stimuli and Production of Original Response by English-Speaking Indian High School Students. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 77(1). 348–350. 1 indexed citations
15.
Morse, David T. & Joe Khatena. (1991). Factor Structure of the Khatena-Morse Multitalent Perception Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 72(3). 867–874. 1 indexed citations
16.
Khatena, Joe & David T. Morse. (1990). Additional Evidence on Reliability and Validity for the Khatena-Morse Multitalent Perception Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 70(3_suppl). 1267–1270. 5 indexed citations
17.
Morse, David T. & Joe Khatena. (1988). Evidence for Validity of the Khatena-Morse Multitalent Perception Inventory as Indicated by Differential Performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 66(2). 591–594. 3 indexed citations
18.
Masten, William G., et al.. (1988). Self-Estimates of Adaptors and Innovators on the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Psychological Reports. 63(2). 587–590. 1 indexed citations
19.
Khatena, Joe & David T. Morse. (1987). Preliminary Study of the Khatena-Morse Multitalent Perception Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 64(3_suppl). 1187–1190. 9 indexed citations
20.
Morse, David T.. (1971). Motown & the arrival of black music. Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026