David Stroupe

2.1k total citations · 3 hit papers
30 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

David Stroupe is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, David Stroupe has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Education, 16 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in David Stroupe's work include Science Education and Pedagogy (20 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (11 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (8 papers). David Stroupe is often cited by papers focused on Science Education and Pedagogy (20 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (11 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (8 papers). David Stroupe collaborates with scholars based in United States. David Stroupe's co-authors include Mark Windschitl, Jessica Thompson, Melissa Braaten, Leema K. Berland, Emily Miller, Eve Manz, Rosemary S. Russ, Hosun Kang, Peter White and Marcos D. Caballero and has published in prestigious journals such as Teaching and Teacher Education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching and Science Education.

In The Last Decade

David Stroupe

28 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools... 2012 2026 2016 2021 2012 2018 2014 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Stroupe United States 15 1.3k 773 183 106 94 30 1.5k
Melissa Braaten United States 14 2.0k 1.5× 1.1k 1.4× 252 1.4× 185 1.7× 87 0.9× 22 2.3k
Hilary Hollingsworth Australia 11 1.6k 1.2× 420 0.5× 159 0.9× 74 0.7× 62 0.7× 22 1.8k
Pamela Mulhall Australia 11 1.4k 1.1× 556 0.7× 231 1.3× 160 1.5× 86 0.9× 20 1.6k
Rosemary S. Russ United States 16 1.2k 0.9× 845 1.1× 132 0.7× 41 0.4× 110 1.2× 43 1.5k
Soonhye Park United States 21 1.9k 1.4× 872 1.1× 297 1.6× 190 1.8× 144 1.5× 52 2.3k
Jessica Thompson United States 16 2.0k 1.6× 1.1k 1.4× 260 1.4× 221 2.1× 105 1.1× 36 2.3k
Vanessa Kind United Kingdom 17 1.5k 1.2× 723 0.9× 200 1.1× 191 1.8× 58 0.6× 36 1.9k
Lawrence P. Gallagher United States 13 1.2k 0.9× 389 0.5× 127 0.7× 157 1.5× 93 1.0× 20 1.5k
Francesca M. Forzani United States 7 1.4k 1.1× 364 0.5× 309 1.7× 84 0.8× 41 0.4× 8 1.6k
Alister Jones New Zealand 21 1.1k 0.8× 403 0.5× 103 0.6× 109 1.0× 67 0.7× 70 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by David Stroupe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Stroupe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Stroupe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Stroupe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Stroupe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Stroupe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Stroupe. The network helps show where David Stroupe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Stroupe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Stroupe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Stroupe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Stroupe. David Stroupe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McDonald, Scott, et al.. (2025). Embracing Asset Perspectives in Science Education Research: A Call for Change. Science Education. 110(2). 351–356.
2.
Stroupe, David, et al.. (2024). Epistemic injustice and the “Nature of Science”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 62(4). 901–941. 3 indexed citations
3.
White, Peter, et al.. (2024). Conducting Authentic Moth Research with Students to Encourage Scientific Inquiry. Science Scope. 47(4). 56–62.
5.
Shah, Niral, et al.. (2022). Tracking Inequity: An Actionable Approach to Addressing Inequities in Physics Classrooms. The Physics Teacher. 60(6). 414–418. 3 indexed citations
6.
McDonald, Scott, et al.. (2021). What you find depends on how you see: examining asset and deficit perspectives of preservice science teachers’ knowledge and learning. Studies in Science Education. 58(1). 49–80. 25 indexed citations
7.
Stroupe, David & J. Hancock. (2021). Examining mentor teachers’ critical pedagogical discourses and participation in an era of changing science standards and pedagogies. Teaching and Teacher Education. 109. 103558–103558. 2 indexed citations
8.
Stroupe, David, et al.. (2021). Becoming Ambitious: How a Practice-based Methods Course and “Macroteaching” Shaped Beginning Teachers’ Critical Pedagogical Discourses. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 33(6). 683–702. 7 indexed citations
9.
Stroupe, David, J. Hancock, & Amelia Wenk Gotwals. (2020). What to Do During a Whale-nami? Supporting Preservice Teachers' Learning During an Extended Teaching Rehearsal.. ICLS. 1 indexed citations
10.
Windschitl, Mark, Jessica Thompson, Melissa Braaten, & David Stroupe. (2019). Sharing a Vision, Sharing Practices: How Communities of Educators Improve Teaching. Remedial and Special Education. 40(6). 380–390. 10 indexed citations
11.
Stroupe, David, Jean Moon, & Sarah Michaels. (2019). Introduction to special issue: Epistemic tools in science education. Science Education. 103(4). 948–951. 25 indexed citations
12.
Stroupe, David, Marcos D. Caballero, & Peter White. (2018). Fostering students’ epistemic agency through the co‐configuration of moth research. Science Education. 102(6). 1176–1200. 51 indexed citations
13.
Stroupe, David & Amelia Wenk Gotwals. (2017). “It’s 1000 Degrees in Here When I Teach”: Providing Preservice Teachers With an Extended Opportunity to Approximate Ambitious Instruction. Journal of Teacher Education. 69(3). 294–306. 29 indexed citations
14.
Windschitl, Mark & David Stroupe. (2017). The Three-Story Challenge. Journal of Teacher Education. 68(3). 251–261. 52 indexed citations
15.
Kang, Hosun, Mark Windschitl, David Stroupe, & Jessica Thompson. (2016). Designing, launching, and implementing high quality learning opportunities for students that advance scientific thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 53(9). 1316–1340. 102 indexed citations
16.
Stroupe, David. (2016). Beginning Teachers' Use of Resources to Enact and Learn from Ambitious Instruction. Cognition and Instruction. 34(1). 51–77. 32 indexed citations
17.
Thompson, Jessica, et al.. (2016). Rigor and Responsiveness in Classroom Activity. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 118(5). 1–58. 88 indexed citations
18.
Stroupe, David. (2014). Examining Classroom Science Practice Communities: How Teachers and Students Negotiate Epistemic Agency and Learn Science‐as‐Practice. Science Education. 98(3). 487–516. 260 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Stroupe, David, et al.. (2014). Students Modeling Molecule Movement Through Science Theater. Science Scope. 38(2). 70–77. 2 indexed citations
20.
Windschitl, Mark, Jessica Thompson, Melissa Braaten, & David Stroupe. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education. 96(5). 878–903. 426 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026