Mark van Atten

31 papers receiving 144 citations

Peers

Mark van Atten
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 93
  • History and Philosophy of Science 81
  • Theoretical Computer Science 42
  • Philosophy 41
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 34
Replace Carlo Cellucci with:
Carlo Cellucci Italy
Sean Walsh United States
Alexander Paseau United Kingdom
Richard Tieszen United States
Erich H. Reck United States
Paul Cortois Belgium
Mary Leng United Kingdom
Danielle Macbeth United States
Volker Peckhaus Germany
Sanford Shieh United States
Mark van Atten relative to Carlo Cellucci Italy Carlo Cellucci's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Carlo Cellucci · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark van Atten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark van Atten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark van Atten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark van Atten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark van Atten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark van Atten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark van Atten. The network helps show where Mark van Atten may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark van Atten

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark van Atten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark van Atten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark van Atten. Mark van Atten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 3
3 7
4 13
5 1
6 4
7
One Hundred Years of Intuitionism : The Cerisy Conference
1
8
The Development of Intuitionistic Logic
12
9 2
10
The hypothetical judgement in the history of intuitionistic logic
3
11
The correspondence between Oskar Becker and Arend Heyting
3
12 1
13 1
14 4
15
Johannes Daubert's Notes from Husserl's Mathematical-Philosophical Exercises, Summer Semester 1905
1
16 21
17 3
18 7
19 15
20 1

About Mark van Atten

Mark van Atten is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 165 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (11 papers) and History and Theory of Mathematics (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (42 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (81 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (93 citations). Mark van Atten has collaborated with scholars based in France, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dirk van Dalen, Juliette Kennedy, Richard Tieszen, Göran Sundholm, Mikhail G. Katz, Karl Schuhmann, David Sherry, Hans Poser, Vladimir Kanovei and Pietro Mancosu. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement and Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026