Language Sciences

1.5k papers and 14.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Language Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 14.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Language Sciences usually cover Language and Linguistics (973 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (581 papers) and Linguistics and Language (430 papers) specifically the topics of Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (483 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (407 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (374 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Language Sciences are Edward C. Stewart, James W. Ney, Nigel Love, Michael Tomasello, Talbot J. Taylor, Stephen J. Cowley, Elissa L. Newport, Sune Vork Steffensen, Alexander V. Kravchenko and Adam M. Croom.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Language Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Language Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Language Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Language Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Language Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Language Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Language Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025