Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Failing at Fairness: How America's Schools Cheat Girls.
1995497 citationsMyra Sadker, David Sadker et al.profile →
Citations per year, relative to David Sadker David Sadker (= 1×)
peers
Myra Sadker
Countries citing papers authored by David Sadker
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David Sadker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Sadker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Sadker more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Sadker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Sadker. The network helps show where David Sadker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Sadker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Sadker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Sadker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Sadker. David Sadker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sadker, David, et al.. (2016). Gender Insights Coming to Your Classroom.. Educational leadership. 74(3). 62–68.1 indexed citations
Sadker, David & Karen Zittleman. (2010). Teachers, School, and Society.13 indexed citations
4.
Sadker, David & Karen Zittleman. (2005). Closing the Gender Gap--Again! Just When Educators Thought It Was No Longer An Issue, Gender Bias Is Back In A New Context.. Principal. 84(4). 18–22.9 indexed citations
5.
Sadker, David & Karen Zittleman. (2005). Gender Bias Lives, for Both Sexes.. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review. 70(8). 27–30.13 indexed citations
6.
Zittleman, Karen & David Sadker. (2003). The Unfinished Gender Revolution.. Educational leadership. 60(4). 59–63.9 indexed citations
7.
Zittleman, Karen & David Sadker. (2003). Teacher Education and Gender Equity: The Unfinished Revolution.3 indexed citations
8.
Sadker, David & Myra Sadker. (2000). Técnicas para la elaboración de preguntas. 173–228.1 indexed citations
9.
Sadker, Myra & David Sadker. (1995). Failing at fairness : how our schools cheat girls.358 indexed citations
Sadker, Myra & David Sadker. (1986). Sexism in the Classroom: From Grade School to Graduate School.. Phi Delta Kappan. 67(7).143 indexed citations
12.
Sadker, David & Myra Sadker. (1985). Is the O.K. Classroom O.K.. Phi Delta Kappan. 66(5).28 indexed citations
13.
Sadker, Myra & David Sadker. (1985). Sexism in the Classroom.. Vocational education journal. 60(7). 30–32.21 indexed citations
14.
Sadker, Myra & David Sadker. (1981). The Development and Field Trial of a Non-Sexist Teacher Education Curriculum.. The High School journal. 64(8).5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.