David N.M. Wright

62 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

David N.M. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Statistics and Probability 116
  • Oncology 233
  • General Health Professions 159
  • Virology 32
  • Nephrology 60
Replace Adrian David Cook with:
Adrian David Cook United Kingdom
Kathryn Taylor United Kingdom
Vincent S. Staggs United States
Qingzhao Yu United States
Abigail B. Shoben United States
Michael D. Swartz United States
Imran Rafi United Kingdom
Hawre J. Jalal United States
Anita Chawla United States
Mary E. Ropka United States
David N.M. Wright relative to Adrian David Cook United Kingdom Adrian David Cook's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×
Adrian David Cook · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David N.M. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David N.M. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David N.M. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David N.M. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David N.M. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David N.M. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David N.M. Wright. The network helps show where David N.M. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David N.M. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David N.M. Wright Line = papers co-authored together David N.M. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009208
2 1990118
3 2006109
4 202191
5 200677
6 200676
7 201075
8 202069
9 201057
10 200756
11 202456
12 200547
13 202045
14 200642
15 200337
16 200830
17 201730
18 202430
19 201428
20 199024

About David N.M. Wright

David N.M. Wright is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Oncology, General Health Professions, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (7 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (7 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions (2 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (1 paper) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (116 citations), Oncology (233 citations), General Health Professions (159 citations), Virology (32 citations) and Nephrology (60 citations). David N.M. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jane B. Hopkinson, Claire L. Foster, Jessica L. Corner, Liz Roffe, Richard F. Lockey, John W. McDonald, Robert P. Nelson, Dennis K. Ledford, Walter L. Trudeau and Enrique Fernández Caldas. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Palliative Medicine, Health Expectations, Pharmaceutical Statistics and Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact