Pharmaceutical Statistics

1.1k papers and 16.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Pharmaceutical Statistics in the last decades have received a total of 16.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Pharmaceutical Statistics usually cover Statistics and Probability (961 papers), Management Science and Operations Research (334 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (296 papers) specifically the topics of Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (859 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (323 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (280 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pharmaceutical Statistics are Peter C. Austin, Steven A. Julious, Jeanne L. Sebaugh, P. W. Lane, Ulrich Meier, Stephen Senn, Christy Chuang‐Stein, Andrew P. Grieve, Hung Hung and Brian L. Wiens.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pharmaceutical Statistics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pharmaceutical Statistics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pharmaceutical Statistics.

Countries where authors publish in Pharmaceutical Statistics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pharmaceutical Statistics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pharmaceutical Statistics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pharmaceutical Statistics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025