David Pitcher
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Face Recognition and Perception 40
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 21
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 14
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 6
- Neural dynamics and brain function 5
-
- Multisensory perception and integration 6
- Neurology top 5%
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 5
-
- Visual Attention and Saliency Detection 8
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Bradley DuchaineVincent WalshLeslie G. UngerleiderGalit YovelNancy KanwisherLúcia GarridoDaniel D. DilksRebecca Saxe
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
David Pitcher
49 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.3k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 726
- Neurology 210
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 420
- Social Psychology 410
Countries citing papers authored by David Pitcher
This map shows the geographic impact of David Pitcher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Pitcher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Pitcher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Pitcher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Pitcher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Pitcher. The network helps show where David Pitcher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Pitcher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 108 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 69 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 40 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 35 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 46 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 288 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 325 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 257 | |
| 18 | TMS disrupts the perception and embodiment of facial expressions. | 2008 | 18 |
| 19 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 364 |
About David Pitcher
David Pitcher is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neurology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Neurology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (40 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (21 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (8 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.3k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (726 citations), Neurology (210 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (420 citations) and Social Psychology (410 citations). David Pitcher has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Bradley Duchaine, Vincent Walsh, Leslie G. Ungerleider, Galit Yovel, Nancy Kanwisher, Lúcia Garrido, Vincent Walsh, Daniel D. Dilks, Rebecca Saxe and Christina Triantafyllou. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, Journal of Vision, Journal of Neuroscience, NeuroImage and Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.