Ikumi Okamoto

541 total citations
16 papers, 401 citations indexed

About

Ikumi Okamoto is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Nephrology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ikumi Okamoto has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 401 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in General Health Professions, 8 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 4 papers in Nephrology. Recurrent topics in Ikumi Okamoto's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers). Ikumi Okamoto is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers). Ikumi Okamoto collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Ikumi Okamoto's co-authors include Julia Addington‐Hall, Jane B. Hopkinson, Joanne Brown, Fergus Caskey, Paul Roderick, Hugh C. Rayner, Fliss EM Murtagh, Sarah Tonkin‐Crine, Ken Farrington and Claire Foster and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Kidney Diseases and Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.

In The Last Decade

Ikumi Okamoto

16 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ikumi Okamoto United Kingdom 11 168 121 108 79 76 16 401
Gemma Collett Australia 11 118 0.7× 85 0.7× 136 1.3× 35 0.4× 49 0.6× 14 359
Janine Farragher Canada 11 45 0.3× 75 0.6× 186 1.7× 67 0.8× 55 0.7× 29 406
Cristina Martins Brazil 11 101 0.6× 83 0.7× 116 1.1× 63 0.8× 47 0.6× 20 394
Meredith Doherty United States 11 114 0.7× 86 0.7× 39 0.4× 71 0.9× 54 0.7× 30 498
Amy M. Corcoran United States 11 184 1.1× 98 0.8× 20 0.2× 66 0.8× 54 0.7× 14 361
Suzanne Rainsford Australia 10 220 1.3× 118 1.0× 39 0.4× 22 0.3× 46 0.6× 25 317
J Addington-Hall United Kingdom 8 226 1.3× 115 1.0× 18 0.2× 71 0.9× 71 0.9× 12 325
Dilzayn Panjwani Canada 9 39 0.2× 128 1.1× 63 0.6× 25 0.3× 29 0.4× 10 353
Caroline Eyles United Kingdom 13 75 0.4× 124 1.0× 17 0.2× 87 1.1× 28 0.4× 29 486
Julia Hackett United Kingdom 10 137 0.8× 68 0.6× 18 0.2× 49 0.6× 104 1.4× 33 276

Countries citing papers authored by Ikumi Okamoto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ikumi Okamoto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ikumi Okamoto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ikumi Okamoto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ikumi Okamoto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ikumi Okamoto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ikumi Okamoto. The network helps show where Ikumi Okamoto may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ikumi Okamoto

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ikumi Okamoto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ikumi Okamoto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ikumi Okamoto. Ikumi Okamoto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Pask, Sophie, Sarah Greenley, Anna E Bone, et al.. (2024). The effectiveness of out-of-hours palliative care telephone advice lines: A rapid systematic review. Palliative Medicine. 38(6). 625–643. 6 indexed citations
2.
Pask, Sophie, Rashmi Kumar, Ikumi Okamoto, et al.. (2024). Telephone advice lines for adults with advanced illness and their family carers: a qualitative analysis and novel practical framework. Palliative Medicine. 38(5). 555–571. 1 indexed citations
3.
Avery, Miriam, et al.. (2018). Reuse of intermittent catheters: a qualitative study of IC users’ perspectives. BMJ Open. 8(8). e021554–e021554. 21 indexed citations
4.
Owen‐Smith, Amanda, Sarah Tonkin‐Crine, Hugh C. Rayner, et al.. (2018). Decision-making for people with dementia and advanced kidney disease: a secondary qualitative analysis of interviews from the Conservative Kidney Management Assessment of Practice Patterns Study. BMJ Open. 8(11). e022385–e022385. 13 indexed citations
5.
Okamoto, Ikumi, et al.. (2017). Intermittent catheter users’ symptom identification, description and management of urinary tract infection: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 7(9). e016453–e016453. 13 indexed citations
6.
Roderick, Paul, Hugh C. Rayner, Sarah Tonkin‐Crine, et al.. (2015). A national study of practice patterns in UK renal units in the use of dialysis and conservative kidney management to treat people aged 75 years and over with chronic kidney failure. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(12). 1–186. 37 indexed citations
7.
Okamoto, Ikumi. (2015). 'It's Got to Be the Patient's Decision': Practicing Shared Decision-making in the U.K. Renal Units. Anthropology in Action. 22(1). 1 indexed citations
8.
Okamoto, Ikumi, Sarah Tonkin‐Crine, Hugh C. Rayner, et al.. (2014). Conservative Care for ESRD in the United Kingdom. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 10(1). 120–126. 41 indexed citations
9.
Tonkin‐Crine, Sarah, Ikumi Okamoto, Geraldine Leydon, et al.. (2014). Understanding by Older Patients of Dialysis and Conservative Management for Chronic Kidney Failure. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 65(3). 443–450. 82 indexed citations
10.
Fenlon, Deborah, Kim Chivers Seymour, Ikumi Okamoto, et al.. (2013). Lessons learnt recruiting to a multi-site UK cohort study to explore recovery of health and well-being after colorectal cancer (CREW study). BMC Medical Research Methodology. 13(1). 153–153. 11 indexed citations
11.
Hopkinson, Jane B., Joanne Brown, Ikumi Okamoto, & Julia Addington‐Hall. (2011). The Effectiveness of Patient-Family Carer (Couple) Intervention for the Management of Symptoms and Other Health-Related Problems in People Affected by Cancer: A Systematic Literature Search and Narrative Review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 43(1). 111–142. 78 indexed citations
12.
Okamoto, Ikumi, David Wright, & Claire Foster. (2011). Impact of cancer on everyday life: a systematic appraisal of the research evidence. Health Expectations. 15(1). 97–111. 17 indexed citations
13.
Hopkinson, Jane B., Ikumi Okamoto, & Julia Addington‐Hall. (2010). What to eat when off treatment and living with involuntary weight loss and cancer: a systematic search and narrative review. Supportive Care in Cancer. 19(1). 1–17. 21 indexed citations
15.
Hopkinson, Jane B., Claire Foster, Peter Nicholls, et al.. (2008). Overcoming obstacles to conducting trials in the context of palliative care: an exploratory phase II cluster randomised trial to investigate the effectiveness of the Macmillan Approach to Weight Loss and Eating Difficulties (MAWE). ORCA Online Research @Cardiff. 2 indexed citations
16.
Okamoto, Ikumi. (2008). Tairyokuas a belief system of health and illness: a study of cancer patients in Japan. Anthropology and Medicine. 15(3). 239–249. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026