Oonagh Meade

1.1k citations
38 papers · 565 indexed · h-index 14

Oonagh Meade

36 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers

Oonagh Meade
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Clinical Psychology 193
  • General Health Professions 204
  • Applied Psychology 40
  • Health 58
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 35
Replace Doris Leung with:
Doris Leung Hong Kong
Dilek Avcı Türkiye
Vicky Duncan Canada
Kirsti Riiser Norway
Beth Mastel‐Smith United States
Natalie Purcell United States
Maite Martín-Aragón Gelabert Spain
Alessandro Germani Italy
Dıjle Ayar Türkiye
Gemma Wilson United Kingdom
Oonagh Meade relative to Doris Leung Hong Kong Doris Leung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Doris Leung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Oonagh Meade

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Oonagh Meade's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oonagh Meade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oonagh Meade more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Oonagh Meade

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oonagh Meade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oonagh Meade. The network helps show where Oonagh Meade may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Oonagh Meade, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Oonagh Meade Line = papers co-authored together Oonagh Meade links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20240
3 20244
4 20232
5 20231
6 20239
7 202121
8 20202
9 20202
10 202013
11 201818
12 201729
13
Does advertising patient and public involvement in a trial to potential participants improve recruitment and response rates? An embedded cluster randomised trial
20171
14 201613
15 2016146
16 201518
17 201412
18 201320
19 201211
20 201136

About Oonagh Meade

Oonagh Meade is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Health, General Health Professions, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 565 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (7 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (5 papers), Agriculture and Farm Safety (4 papers), Social Media in Health Education (4 papers), Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers) and Health, psychology, and well-being (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (193 citations), General Health Professions (204 citations), Applied Psychology (40 citations), Health (58 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (35 citations). Oonagh Meade has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Callaghan, Tim Carter, Ioannis D. Morres, Joanne Lymn, Karina Lovell, Andrew Grundy, Penny Bee, Heather Buchanan, Neil Coulson and Claire Fraser. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Education, British Journal of Health Psychology, Trials, International Journal of Workplace Health Management and Journal of Adolescence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026