David Haley

44 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

David Haley
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Pharmacy 366
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 167
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 756
  • Clinical Psychology 419
  • Social Psychology 328
Replace Hong Chen with:
Hong Chen China
Katherine A. Johnson Australia
Amy Margolis United States
Michael Coccia United States
Elizabeth Garland Canada
Robert I. Kabacoff United States
Yvonne Harrison United Kingdom
Jeffery J. Jankowski United States
Nadine Forget‐Dubois Canada
Hollie V. Thomas United Kingdom
David Haley relative to Hong Chen China Hong Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×17.6×
Hong Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Haley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Haley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Haley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Haley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Haley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Haley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Haley. The network helps show where David Haley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Haley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Haley Line = papers co-authored together David Haley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003294
2 2004278
3 2007212
4 2006145
5 2007101
6 199967
7 200566
8
Setting the Standard: Certification, Governance, and the Forest Stewardship Council
200852
9 200736
10 200034
11 200832
12
Calculating train braking distance
200128
13 197626
14 201825
15 201624
16 201017
17 201616
18 199215
19 199515
20 199015

About David Haley

David Haley is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Behavioral Neuroscience, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Social Psychology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Management and Policy (16 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (8 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (7 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), Infant Health and Development (6 papers), Forest ecology and management (6 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (5 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (366 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (167 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (756 citations), Clinical Psychology (419 citations) and Social Psychology (328 citations). David Haley has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kathy Stansbury, Ruth E. Grunau, Joanne Weinberg, Michael F. Whitfield, Wayne Yu, Nancy S. Handmaker, Jean Lowe, Tim F. Oberlander, Paul Thiessen and Alfonso Solimano. Their work appears in journals such as The Forestry Chronicle, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Canadian Public Policy, Journal of Forestry and Child Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026