This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Gale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Gale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Gale more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Gale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Gale. The network helps show where Fred Gale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fred Gale
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fred Gale.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fred Gale based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Fred Gale. Fred Gale is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gale, Fred, Joanna Vince, & Anna K. Farmery. (2017). Certification schemes in the Australian organic wine industry. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
8.
Murphy‐Gregory, Hannah & Fred Gale. (2015). The Practice of Private Governance: Precedents from Other Policy Arenas. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
9.
Doelle, Meinhard, et al.. (2012). Governing Information: A Three Dimensional Analysis of Environmental Assessment. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
10.
Tollefson, Chris, Fred Gale, & David Haley. (2009). Setting the Standard. University of British Columbia Press eBooks.10 indexed citations
11.
Gale, Fred. (2006). The Political Economy of Sustainable Development in the Asia-Pacific: Lessons the Forest Stewardship Council Experience. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).5 indexed citations
12.
Meidinger, Errol, Benjamin Cashore, Deanna Newsom, & Fred Gale. (2006). Forest Certification in Developing and Transitioning Countries: Part of a Sustainable Future?. SSRN Electronic Journal.7 indexed citations
13.
Gale, Fred & Marcus Haward. (2004). Public accountability in private regulation: contrasting models of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and Marine Stewardship Council (MSC). eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).14 indexed citations
14.
Gale, Fred. (2003). Discourse and Southeast Asian Deforestation: A case study of the International Tropical Timber Organization. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).2 indexed citations
15.
Gale, Fred, et al.. (2000). Nature, production, power : towards an ecological political economy. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).12 indexed citations
16.
Gale, Fred. (1998). Theorizing Power in Ecological Economics. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).21 indexed citations
Curran, Declan, et al.. (1997). Forests in Trust: Reforming British Columbia's Forest Tenure System for Ecosystem and Community Health. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).9 indexed citations
19.
Gale, Fred. (1997). The Greening of Political Economy: An Ecological Political Economic Approach to Production and Consumption. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
20.
Gale, Fred, et al.. (1996). Attitudes Towards Eco-Certification in the BC Forest Products Industry. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.