David Goldie
- Political Science and International Relations
- Sociology and Political Science
- Education
- Literature and Literary Theory
- Communication
- Co-authors
- Christopher LubienskiHuriya JabbarGerard CarruthersEdna LongleyDavid JamesJoanne ShattockSarah ColeMargaret R. Higonnet
- Topics
- Scottish History and National Identity (6 papers)Irish and British Studies (4 papers)Modernist Literature and Criticism (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
David Goldie
10 papers receiving 79 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Political Science and International Relations 34
- Sociology and Political Science 31
- Education 20
- Literature and Literary Theory 19
- Communication 15
Countries citing papers authored by David Goldie
This map shows the geographic impact of David Goldie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Goldie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Goldie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Goldie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Goldie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Goldie. The network helps show where David Goldie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Goldie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Goldie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Goldie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Goldie. David Goldie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 59 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Scotland and the fictions of geography: North Britain 1760–1830 by Penny Fielding | 1 |
| 8 | Robert Burns and the First World War | 1 |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | Hugh MacDiarmid, Harry Lauder, and Scottish popular culture | 2 |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | A Critical Difference: T. S. Eliot and John Middleton Murry in English Literary Criticism, 1919-1928 | 5 |
About David Goldie
David Goldie is a scholar working on History, Literature and Literary Theory and Information Systems and Management, having authored 14 papers that have together received 98 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scottish History and National Identity (6 papers), Irish and British Studies (4 papers) and Modernist Literature and Criticism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (15 citations), Information Systems and Management (13 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (19 citations). David Goldie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Lubienski, Huriya Jabbar, Gerard Carruthers, Edna Longley, David James, Joanne Shattock, Sarah Cole, Margaret R. Higonnet, Peter Howarth and Elaine Freedgood. Their work appears in journals such as Educational Policy, Critical Quarterly and Philological quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.