This map shows the geographic impact of Edmund King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edmund King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edmund King more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edmund King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edmund King. The network helps show where Edmund King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edmund King
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edmund King.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edmund King based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Edmund King. Edmund King is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
King, Edmund, et al.. (2019). Reusing Historical Questionnaire Data and Using Newly Commissioned Oral History Interviews as Evidence in the History of Reading. Open Research Online (The Open University).2 indexed citations
4.
King, Edmund. (2017). King Stephen. Yale University Press eBooks.
King, Edmund. (2014). E. W. Hornung's Unpublished "Diary," the YMCA, and the Reading Soldier in the First World War. English Literature in Transition 1880-1920. 57(3). 361–387.3 indexed citations
King, Edmund. (2010). Alexander Turnbull's 'Dream Imperial' : Collecting Shakespeare in the Colonial Antipodes. Open Research Online (The Open University). 34(2). 69.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.