David B. Wong
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Philosophy top 1%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Co-authors
- Kwong‐loi ShunRobert Elliott AllinsonOwen FlanaganRoss A. ThompsonJoel J. KuppermanDarcia NarváezJorge MollGustavo Carlo
- Topics
- Chinese history and philosophy (15 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (10 papers)Emotions and Moral Behavior (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSingapore
In The Last Decade
David B. Wong
53 papers receiving 682 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Sociology and Political Science 328
- Cognitive Neuroscience 243
- Philosophy 229
- Social Psychology 215
- Political Science and International Relations 108
Countries citing papers authored by David B. Wong
This map shows the geographic impact of David B. Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David B. Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David B. Wong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David B. Wong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David B. Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David B. Wong. The network helps show where David B. Wong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David B. Wong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David B. Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David B. Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David B. Wong. David B. Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 87 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | What is the nature of morality? A response to Casebeer, Railton and Ruse | 2 |
| 8 | 85 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | Zhuangzi and the Obsession with Being Right | 19 |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | Crossing Cultures in Moral Psychology | 1 |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About David B. Wong
David B. Wong is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 59 papers that have together received 811 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (15 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (10 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (229 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (243 citations) and Religious studies (57 citations). David B. Wong has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Kwong‐loi Shun, Robert Elliott Allinson, Owen Flanagan, Ross A. Thompson, Joel J. Kupperman, Darcia Narváez, Jorge Moll, Gustavo Carlo, Linda J. Skitka and Karl Aquino. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Safety Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.