Rosalind Hursthouse
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Gavin LawrenceWarren QuinnMartha C. NussbaumOliver A. JohnsonJulian WuerthPaul GuyerMichael SloteLawrence J. Jost
- Topics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory (11 papers)Ethics in medical practice (8 papers)Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited KingdomHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Rosalind Hursthouse
28 papers receiving 980 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Philosophy 560
- Cognitive Neuroscience 470
- General Health Professions 244
- Sociology and Political Science 229
- Social Psychology 173
Countries citing papers authored by Rosalind Hursthouse
This map shows the geographic impact of Rosalind Hursthouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rosalind Hursthouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rosalind Hursthouse more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rosalind Hursthouse
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rosalind Hursthouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rosalind Hursthouse. The network helps show where Rosalind Hursthouse may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rosalind Hursthouse
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rosalind Hursthouse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rosalind Hursthouse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rosalind Hursthouse. Rosalind Hursthouse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 47 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | Ethics, Humans and Other Animals: An Introduction with Readings | 26 |
| 10 | On Virtue Ethicsbreakdown → | 697 |
| 11 | Virtues and Reasons: Philippa Foot and Moral Theory | 48 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 90 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Rosalind Hursthouse
Rosalind Hursthouse is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Health Professions and Law, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (11 papers), Ethics in medical practice (8 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (560 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (470 citations) and Information Systems and Management (116 citations). Rosalind Hursthouse has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Gavin Lawrence, Warren Quinn, Martha C. Nussbaum, Oliver A. Johnson, Julian Wuerth, Paul Guyer, Michael Slote, Lawrence J. Jost, Timothy Chappell and Christine Swanton. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, Frontiers in Neurology and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.