Danielle Moore

27 papers receiving 546 citations

Peers

Danielle Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 31
  • Health 156
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 44
  • General Health Professions 251
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 106
Replace Lawrence Schonfeld with:
Lawrence Schonfeld United States
Fernando A. Wagner United States
Sandra Kraemer United States
P.G. Coleman United Kingdom
Yosef Zenebe Ethiopia
Jennifer Wenborn United Kingdom
Charlotte R. Stoner United Kingdom
Soledad Argüelles United States
Anna Kågström Czechia
Regina C. Sims United States
Danielle Moore relative to Lawrence Schonfeld United States Lawrence Schonfeld's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Lawrence Schonfeld · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Moore. The network helps show where Danielle Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Moore Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018127
2 201478
3 201865
4 201941
5 201326
6 202025
7 201925
8 201625
9 201922
10 201621
11 201921
12 201517
13 201812
14 202111
15 20149
16 20207
17 20187
18
Overcoming the challenges of translating mental health instruments into sign languages
20136
19 20214
20 20243

About Danielle Moore

Danielle Moore is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 27 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (5 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (31 citations), Health (156 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (44 citations), General Health Professions (251 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (106 citations). Danielle Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Hanratty, Nicole Valtorta, Daniel Stow, Barry Wright, Fiona E. Matthews, Victoria Allgar, Lieve Van den Block, Katherine Froggatt, Thomas Keegan and Katarzyna Szczerbińska. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Age and Ageing, American Journal of Public Health, Journal of Parasitology and Health Expectations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact