Ruth Piers
-
- Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units 13
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 43
- Patient Dignity and Privacy 13
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Frailty in Older Adults 10
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 10
- Research and Theory top 10%
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders 8
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use 6
-
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health 6
- Co-authors
- Nele Van Den NoortgateDominique BenoîtLet DillenLieve Van den BlockEls SteemanMieke GrypdonckErwin J. O. KompanjeGwenda Albers
- Cited by
- Radiological and Ultrasound TechnologyPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthGeriatrics and Gerontology
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ruth Piers
53 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 283
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 921
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 101
- General Health Professions 620
- Research and Theory 15
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Piers
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Piers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Piers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Piers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Piers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Piers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Piers. The network helps show where Ruth Piers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Piers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 29 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 167 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 237 | |
| 20 | Moral distress and burn-out in nurses on acute geriatric wards | 2010 | 2 |
About Ruth Piers
Ruth Piers is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (43 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (13 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (13 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (10 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (8 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (6 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (283 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (921 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (101 citations). Ruth Piers has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nele Van Den Noortgate, Dominique Benoît, Let Dillen, Lieve Van den Block, Els Steeman, Mieke Grypdonck, Erwin J. O. Kompanje, Gwenda Albers, Paul Vanden Berghe and Joni Gilissen. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, CHEST Journal and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.