Tinne Smets

2.9k citations
79 papers · 1.4k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Tinne Smets

74 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Tinne Smets
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 884
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 58
  • General Health Professions 276
  • Clinical Psychology 197
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 26
Replace Lara Pivodic with:
Lara Pivodic Belgium
Claudia Gamondi Switzerland
Kristen M. Coppola United States
Judith L. Howe United States
Kenneth Chambaere Belgium
Mia Svantesson Sweden
Marieke Groot Netherlands
Karen Harrison Dening United Kingdom
Olav Lindqvist Sweden
Barbara Head United States
Tinne Smets relative to Lara Pivodic Belgium Lara Pivodic's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Lara Pivodic · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tinne Smets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tinne Smets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tinne Smets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tinne Smets more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tinne Smets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tinne Smets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tinne Smets. The network helps show where Tinne Smets may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tinne Smets, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tinne Smets Line = papers co-authored together Tinne Smets links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016104
2 201885
3 201873
4 201061
5 201059
6 201055
7 201248
8 201946
9 201646
10 201244
11 201943
12 200841
13 201935
14 201734
15 201934
16 201530
17 202227
18 201127
19 202224
20 202224

About Tinne Smets

Tinne Smets is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Health and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (46 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (1 paper), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (884 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (58 citations), General Health Professions (276 citations), Clinical Psychology (197 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (26 citations). Tinne Smets has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Luc Deliëns, Joachim Cohen, Lieve Van den Block, Johan Bilsen, Bregje D. Onwuteaka‐Philipsen, Lara Pivodic, Mette L. Rurup, Yanna Van Wesemael, Giovanni Gambassi and Katarzyna Szczerbińska. Their work appears in journals such as Palliative Medicine, BMC Palliative Care, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, International Journal of Integrated Care and BMC Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact