Maud ten Koppel
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 8
- Patient Dignity and Privacy 3
-
- Frailty in Older Adults 2
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes 1
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 6
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 1
-
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health 3
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 1
- Co-authors
- Bregje D. Onwuteaka‐PhilipsenH. Roeline W. PasmanTinne SmetsLieve Van den BlockDanielle MooreKatarzyna SzczerbińskaKirsten EvenblijGuy Widdershoven
- Cited by
- Radiological and Ultrasound TechnologyPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthGeriatrics and Gerontology
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (1 paper)International Journal of Nursing Studies (1 paper)International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsBelgiumUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Maud ten Koppel
10 papers receiving 154 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 25
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 117
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 15
- General Health Professions 92
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 4
Countries citing papers authored by Maud ten Koppel
This map shows the geographic impact of Maud ten Koppel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maud ten Koppel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maud ten Koppel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maud ten Koppel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maud ten Koppel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maud ten Koppel. The network helps show where Maud ten Koppel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Maud ten Koppel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 4 | Physician Visits and Recognition of Residents' Terminal Phase in Long-Term Care Facilities: Findings From the PACE Cross-Sectional Study in 6 EU Countries | 2019 | 1 |
| 5 | 2019 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 44 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 8 |
About Maud ten Koppel
Maud ten Koppel is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions, having authored 10 papers that have together received 156 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (25 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (117 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (15 citations). Maud ten Koppel has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Bregje D. Onwuteaka‐Philipsen, H. Roeline W. Pasman, Tinne Smets, Lieve Van den Block, Danielle Moore, Katarzyna Szczerbińska, Kirsten Evenblij, Guy Widdershoven, Jenny T. van der Steen and Marika Kylänen. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, International Journal of Nursing Studies and International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.