Daniel Waeger

689 total citations
10 papers, 487 citations indexed

About

Daniel Waeger is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Waeger has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 487 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Strategy and Management, 5 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 3 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Daniel Waeger's work include Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (5 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers). Daniel Waeger is often cited by papers focused on Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (5 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers). Daniel Waeger collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Netherlands and United States. Daniel Waeger's co-authors include Sebastian Hafenbrädl, Klaus Weber, Sébastien Mena, Gerd Gigerenzer, Julian N. Marewski, Martha L. Maznevski and Nicholas Athanassiou and has published in prestigious journals such as Academy of Management Review, Academy of Management Journal and Journal of Business Research.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Waeger

10 papers receiving 469 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Waeger Canada 6 273 166 110 77 64 10 487
John Simmons United Kingdom 13 336 1.2× 212 1.3× 225 2.0× 93 1.2× 95 1.5× 27 652
Josie Fisher Australia 11 194 0.7× 72 0.4× 118 1.1× 50 0.6× 75 1.2× 27 490
Risto Seppänen Finland 4 348 1.3× 187 1.1× 61 0.6× 129 1.7× 58 0.9× 6 616
Cristina Neesham Australia 10 143 0.5× 134 0.8× 53 0.5× 74 1.0× 46 0.7× 39 479
Øivind Revang Norway 9 350 1.3× 199 1.2× 95 0.9× 90 1.2× 39 0.6× 13 629
Annick Van Rossem Belgium 8 321 1.2× 161 1.0× 184 1.7× 116 1.5× 79 1.2× 14 564
Sven Helin Sweden 13 230 0.8× 183 1.1× 80 0.7× 73 0.9× 209 3.3× 28 510
John Kaler United Kingdom 11 277 1.0× 168 1.0× 105 1.0× 73 0.9× 159 2.5× 16 503
Wajda Wikhamn Sweden 12 189 0.7× 206 1.2× 138 1.3× 104 1.4× 38 0.6× 18 508
Janice Francis Super United States 6 257 0.9× 136 0.8× 80 0.7× 52 0.7× 28 0.4× 9 466

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Waeger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Waeger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Waeger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Waeger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Waeger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Waeger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Waeger. The network helps show where Daniel Waeger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Waeger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Waeger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Waeger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Waeger. Daniel Waeger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
2.
Hafenbrädl, Sebastian & Daniel Waeger. (2019). The business case for CSR: A trump card against hypocrisy?. Journal of Business Research. 129. 838–848. 27 indexed citations
3.
Hafenbrädl, Sebastian & Daniel Waeger. (2019). The Business Case for CSR: A Trump Card against Hypocrisy?. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2019(1). 18284–18284. 3 indexed citations
4.
Waeger, Daniel & Klaus Weber. (2017). Institutional Complexity and Organizational Change: An Open Polity Perspective. Academy of Management Review. 44(2). 336–359. 65 indexed citations
5.
Weber, Klaus & Daniel Waeger. (2017). Organizations as Polities: An Open Systems Perspective. Academy of Management Annals. 11(2). 886–918. 59 indexed citations
6.
Hafenbrädl, Sebastian, Daniel Waeger, Julian N. Marewski, & Gerd Gigerenzer. (2016). Applied decision making with fast-and-frugal heuristics.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 5(2). 215–231. 86 indexed citations
7.
Hafenbrädl, Sebastian & Daniel Waeger. (2016). Ideology and the Micro-foundations of CSR: Why Executives Believe in the Business Case for CSR and how this Affects their CSR Engagements. Academy of Management Journal. 60(4). 1582–1606. 172 indexed citations
8.
Hafenbrädl, Sebastian & Daniel Waeger. (2015). Justifying the Market Economy: Why Executives Believe in the Business Case for CSR. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2015(1). 16594–16594. 1 indexed citations
9.
Mena, Sébastien & Daniel Waeger. (2014). Activism for Corporate Responsibility: Conceptualizing Private Regulation Opportunity Structures. Journal of Management Studies. 51(7). 1091–1117. 69 indexed citations
10.
Maznevski, Martha L., et al.. (2013). "Cultural Distance, Turbulence, and Friction: Advancing Constructs in Cross-border Knowledge Transfer". Academy of Management Proceedings. 2013(1). 15899–15899. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026