Daniel W. Crofts
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Marketing top 10%
- History top 10%
- Anthropology
- Co-authors
- Robert L. ZangrandoPaul S. GoodmanDavid I. HolmesGeorge C. RableRichard H. SewellMichael F. HoltLowell H. HarrisonMargaret M. Bird
- Topics
- American History and Culture (20 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (20 papers)Race, History, and American Society (15 papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewJournal of American HistoryThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Daniel W. Crofts
22 papers receiving 99 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Sociology and Political Science 105
- Political Science and International Relations 83
- Marketing 64
- History 26
- Anthropology 21
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. Crofts
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. Crofts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. Crofts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. Crofts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. Crofts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. Crofts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. Crofts. The network helps show where Daniel W. Crofts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel W. Crofts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel W. Crofts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel W. Crofts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel W. Crofts. Daniel W. Crofts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | Soldier Voting in 1864: The David McKelvy Diary | 0 |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 48 | |
| 19 | James E. Harvey and the Secession Crisis | 2 |
| 20 | 6 |
About Daniel W. Crofts
Daniel W. Crofts is a scholar working on Marketing, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American History and Culture (20 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (20 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (64 citations), Political Science and International Relations (83 citations) and Cultural Studies (21 citations). Daniel W. Crofts has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert L. Zangrando, Paul S. Goodman, David I. Holmes, George C. Rable, Richard H. Sewell, Michael F. Holt, Lowell H. Harrison and Margaret M. Bird. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.