Stephen de Wijze

60 total papers · 418 total citations
27 papers, 176 citations indexed

About

Stephen de Wijze is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen de Wijze has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 176 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Philosophy, 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Stephen de Wijze's work include War, Ethics, and Justification (11 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (8 papers) and Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 papers). Stephen de Wijze is often cited by papers focused on War, Ethics, and Justification (11 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (8 papers) and Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 papers). Stephen de Wijze collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Israel and United States. Stephen de Wijze's co-authors include Tom Goodwin, Daniel Statman, Jonathan Hughes, Raanan Sulitzeanu‐Kenan, Andrew Russell, Micha Mandel and Eve Garrard and has published in prestigious journals such as Educational Philosophy and Theory, Australasian Journal of Philosophy and The British Journal of Politics and International Relations.

In The Last Decade

Stephen de Wijze

24 papers receiving 152 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Stephen de Wijze 118 84 61 48 16 27 176
Bill Wringe 117 1.0× 90 1.1× 86 1.4× 143 3.0× 29 1.8× 34 258
Whitley Kaufman 84 0.7× 48 0.6× 80 1.3× 40 0.8× 32 2.0× 28 163
Anita M. Superson 55 0.5× 60 0.7× 66 1.1× 27 0.6× 10 0.6× 23 156
Michael Gorr 172 1.5× 57 0.7× 46 0.8× 155 3.2× 13 0.8× 22 263
Juha Räikkä 71 0.6× 87 1.0× 87 1.4× 63 1.3× 13 0.8× 38 219
Kristoffer Ahlstrom‐Vij 142 1.2× 69 0.8× 95 1.6× 62 1.3× 6 0.4× 30 210
Brian Rosebury 73 0.6× 35 0.4× 53 0.9× 57 1.2× 21 1.3× 19 170
Phillip Montague 66 0.6× 50 0.6× 58 1.0× 51 1.1× 4 0.3× 27 123
Claire Finkelstein 74 0.6× 57 0.7× 68 1.1× 51 1.1× 6 0.4× 33 153
Aurel Kolnai 71 0.6× 38 0.5× 48 0.8× 33 0.7× 58 3.6× 30 178

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen de Wijze

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen de Wijze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen de Wijze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen de Wijze more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen de Wijze

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen de Wijze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen de Wijze. The network helps show where Stephen de Wijze may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen de Wijze

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen de Wijze. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen de Wijze based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen de Wijze. Stephen de Wijze is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026