Jules Holroyd
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 6
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 8
- Free Will and Agency 7
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies 7
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 6
- Critical Race Theory in Education 2
-
- Emotions and Moral Behavior 2
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 9
- Journals
- Journal of Applied Philosophy (2 papers)Philosophy Compass (2 papers)Philosophical Papers (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Jules Holroyd
22 papers receiving 293 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Philosophy 88
- Cognitive Neuroscience 138
- Sociology and Political Science 196
- Social Psychology 68
- Gender Studies 30
Countries citing papers authored by Jules Holroyd
This map shows the geographic impact of Jules Holroyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jules Holroyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jules Holroyd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jules Holroyd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jules Holroyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jules Holroyd. The network helps show where Jules Holroyd may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Jules Holroyd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 9 | Two Ways of Socialising Responsibility: Circumstantialist and Scaffolded-Responsiveness | 2018 | 0 |
| 10 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 42 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 14 |
About Jules Holroyd
Jules Holroyd is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (7 papers), Free Will and Agency (7 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Critical Race Theory in Education (2 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (88 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (138 citations), Sociology and Political Science (196 citations), Social Psychology (68 citations) and Gender Studies (30 citations). Jules Holroyd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Tom Stafford, Erin Beeghly, Jennifer Saul and Fiona Woollard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Philosophy, Philosophy Compass, Philosophical Papers, Res Publica and Philosophical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.