Law and Philosophy

883 papers and 5.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 883 papers published in Law and Philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 5.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Law and Philosophy usually cover Political Science and International Relations (256 papers), Law (249 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (152 papers) specifically the topics of Free Will and Agency (149 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (129 papers) and War, Ethics, and Justification (97 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Law and Philosophy are Mark Sagoff, Alexander Brown, Jeremy Waldron, David Schmidtz, Judith Wagner DeCew, Larry Alexander, Theodore M. Benditt, Henry Shue, Linda Radzik and Michael D. Bayles.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Law and Philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Law and Philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Law and Philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in Law and Philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Law and Philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Law and Philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Law and Philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025