Daniel Shaw

459 citations
33 papers · 307 indexed · h-index 7

Daniel Shaw

25 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers

Daniel Shaw
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • General Psychology 13
  • Clinical Psychology 131
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 122
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 36
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 116
Replace Dinora Pines with:
Dinora Pines United Kingdom
Heidi Simoni Switzerland
Claire Powell United Kingdom
Jeannine Kalmanovitch
Mary Motz Canada
Thomas St. James O’Connor Canada
Chantal P Delaquis France
Anne‐Sofie Rosén Sweden
ChienTi Plummer Lee United States
Alessandra Bramante Italy
Daniel Shaw relative to Dinora Pines United Kingdom Dinora Pines's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23×
Dinora Pines · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Shaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Shaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Shaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Shaw. The network helps show where Daniel Shaw may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Shaw Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Shaw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20234
3 20221
4 20192
5 20190
6 201824
7 20172
8 2016102
9
Minimal-Counterintuitiveness Revisited:effects of cultural and ontological violations on concept memorability
20133
10 20113
11
Sentencing guidance on knife possession
20101
12
Film amd philosophy : taking movies seriously
20083
13 20081
14 20071
15 20051
16 200327
17 19890
18 19861
19 19851
20 19752

About Daniel Shaw

Daniel Shaw is a scholar working on Philosophy, Clinical Psychology, Cultural Studies, Music and History, having authored 33 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy (4 papers), Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (3 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (2 papers), Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (2 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers) and Child Therapy and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (13 citations), Clinical Psychology (131 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (122 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (36 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (116 citations). Daniel Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kelley Saia, Davida M. Schiff, Elisha M. Wachman, Pooja Mehta, Sarah M. Bagley, Nikita Nikita, Karen C. Wells, Wade F. Horn, Zoë Thomas and Hira Shrestha. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Psychoanalytic Inquiry, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Current Anthropology and Psychoanalytic Dialogues.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026