Ken Pease
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Clinical Psychology
- Political Science and International Relations
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Co-authors
- Paul EkblomDaniel BriggsRoger MatthewsGraham FarrellNick TilleyDan EllingworthAndromachi TseloniDaniel Shaw
- Topics
- Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers)Healthcare innovation and challenges (2 papers)Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaSloveniaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ken Pease
14 papers receiving 184 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Sociology and Political Science 215
- General Health Professions 59
- Clinical Psychology 40
- Political Science and International Relations 35
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 26
Countries citing papers authored by Ken Pease
This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Pease's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Pease with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Pease more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Pease
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Pease. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Pease. The network helps show where Ken Pease may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ken Pease
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ken Pease. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ken Pease based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ken Pease. Ken Pease is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sentencing guidance on knife possession | 1 |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | Reducing Burglary Initiative: early findings on burglary reduction | 12 |
| 4 | Developing Crime Reduction Plans: Some Examples from the Reducing Burglary Initiative | 13 |
| 5 | Secure foundations : key issues in crime prevention, crime reduction and community safety | 57 |
| 6 | Crimes which repeat: undigested evidence from the British Crime Survey 1992 | 11 |
| 7 | 54 | |
| 8 | With a little help from their 'friends'? : reflecting on changing notions of accountability in the probation service | 1 |
| 9 | The Merseyside domestic violence prevention project: some costs and benefits | 9 |
| 10 | Effectiveness Measurement in the Probation Service: A View From the Troops | 6 |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 1 |
About Ken Pease
Ken Pease is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions and Health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 249 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (2 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (215 citations), Public Administration (12 citations) and General Health Professions (59 citations). Ken Pease has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Slovenia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Ekblom, Daniel Briggs, Roger Matthews, Graham Farrell, Nick Tilley, Dan Ellingworth, Andromachi Tseloni and Daniel Shaw. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Sociology, The British Journal of Criminology and Crime and Justice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.