Contemporary Psychoanalysis

1.7k papers and 14.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Contemporary Psychoanalysis in the last decades have received a total of 14.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Psychoanalysis usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.0k papers), General Psychology (328 papers) and Social Psychology (213 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (922 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (328 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (183 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Psychoanalysis are Philip M. Bromberg, Donnel B. Stern, Irwin Z. Hoffman, Edgar A. Levenson, Emmanuel Ghent, James S. Grotstein, Darlene Bregman Ehrenberg, Jay Greenberg, Jessica Benjamin and Alan L. Grey.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Psychoanalysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Psychoanalysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Psychoanalysis.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Psychoanalysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Psychoanalysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Psychoanalysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Psychoanalysis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025