Penny Bickle

679 total citations
28 papers, 353 citations indexed

About

Penny Bickle is a scholar working on Paleontology, Anthropology and Archeology. According to data from OpenAlex, Penny Bickle has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 353 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Paleontology, 12 papers in Anthropology and 12 papers in Archeology. Recurrent topics in Penny Bickle's work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (21 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (9 papers) and Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (7 papers). Penny Bickle is often cited by papers focused on Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (21 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (9 papers) and Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (7 papers). Penny Bickle collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Czechia. Penny Bickle's co-authors include Daniela Hofmann, Linda Fibiger, Alasdair Whittle, Joachim Wahl, R. Alexander Bentley, Julie Hamilton, R.E.M. Hedges, Gisela Grupe, Geoff Nowell and Caroline Hamon and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Penny Bickle

23 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Penny Bickle United Kingdom	11	244	183	133	55	42	28	353
Richard C Sutter United States	12	179 0.7×	272 1.5×	147 1.1×	109 2.0×	65 1.5×	24	428
Sandra Pichler Switzerland	10	216 0.9×	186 1.0×	109 0.8×	61 1.1×	48 1.1×	25	343
Barbara Stopp Switzerland	10	215 0.9×	127 0.7×	118 0.9×	58 1.1×	45 1.1×	21	348
Tammy Buonasera United States	10	177 0.7×	147 0.8×	131 1.0×	59 1.1×	28 0.7×	16	339
Patrice Courtaud France	9	159 0.7×	232 1.3×	137 1.0×	68 1.2×	38 0.9×	37	375
Claudia Gerling Switzerland	9	200 0.8×	135 0.7×	109 0.8×	26 0.5×	33 0.8×	24	253
Ludmila Koryakova Russia	6	180 0.7×	100 0.5×	143 1.1×	32 0.6×	18 0.4×	16	264
Sophie Bergerbrant Sweden	8	187 0.8×	107 0.6×	103 0.8×	37 0.7×	27 0.6×	17	307
Liv Nilsson Stutz Sweden	11	217 0.9×	211 1.2×	168 1.3×	24 0.4×	35 0.8×	43	378
Lesley A. Gregoricka United States	12	202 0.8×	258 1.4×	56 0.4×	60 1.1×	38 0.9×	27	339

Countries citing papers authored by Penny Bickle

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Penny Bickle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Penny Bickle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Penny Bickle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Penny Bickle

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Penny Bickle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Penny Bickle. The network helps show where Penny Bickle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Penny Bickle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Penny Bickle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Penny Bickle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Penny Bickle. Penny Bickle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Smyth, Jessica, et al.. (2025). Social and Genetic Relations in Neolithic Ireland: Re-evaluating Kinship. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 35(3). 435–455. 1 indexed citations

Smyth, Jessica, et al.. (2025). The ‘king’ of Newgrange? A critical analysis of a Neolithic petrous fragment from the passage tomb chamber. Antiquity. 99(405). 672–688. 2 indexed citations

Bickle, Penny, Daniela Hofmann, Katharina Rebay‐Salisbury, et al.. (2025). Moving to Stay in (a Woman’s) Place. Current Anthropology. 66(6). 954–968.

Bickle, Penny, et al.. (2025). New temporal dimensions of the Linearbandkeramik cemetery horizon in Schwetzingen (Germany). Antiquity. 99(407). 1212–1229.

Petr, Libor, et al.. (2024). Technology and provenience of the oldest pottery in the northern Pannonian Basin indicates its affiliation to hunter-gatherers. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 19226–19226. 1 indexed citations

Bonilla, Marta Díaz‐Zorita, et al.. (2024). Patrilocality at the Beginning of Farming? An Isotopic Approach from SE Moravia. Journal of World Prehistory. 37(1). 1–25. 2 indexed citations

Bickle, Penny, et al.. (2023). RADIOCARBON DATING OF GRASS-TEMPERED CERAMIC REVEALS THE EARLIEST POTTERY FROM SLOVAKIA PREDATES THE ARRIVAL OF FARMING. Radiocarbon. 65(3). 733–753. 2 indexed citations

Lundy, Jasmine, Alexandre Lucquin, Richard Hagan, et al.. (2023). Detection of dairy products from multiple taxa in Late Neolithic pottery from Poland: an integrated biomolecular approach. Royal Society Open Science. 10(3). 230124–230124. 12 indexed citations

Rebay‐Salisbury, Katharina, et al.. (2023). To Gender or not To Gender? Exploring Gender Variations through Time and Space. European Journal of Archaeology. 26(3). 271–298. 6 indexed citations

10.

Hamon, Caroline, et al.. (2021). A sexual division of labour at the start of agriculture? A multi-proxy comparison through grave good stone tool technological and use-wear analysis. PLoS ONE. 16(4). e0249130–e0249130. 15 indexed citations

11.

Kolář, Jan, Antoine Muller, Bianca Preda-Bălănică, et al.. (2020). Interviews of recently-tenured academics in Northern Europe: comments on career paths in academic archaeology and some advice for young scholars. 65. 18–28. 1 indexed citations

12.

Bickle, Penny, et al.. (2020). Sexual Inequalities in the Early Neolithic? Exploring Relationships Between Sexes/Genders at the Cemetery of Vedrovice Using Use-Wear Analysis, Diet and Mobility. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 28(1). 232–273. 19 indexed citations

13.

Bickle, Penny. (2019). Thinking Gender Differently: New Approaches to Identity Difference in the Central European Neolithic. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 30(2). 201–218. 31 indexed citations

14.

Bickle, Penny. (2018). Stable isotopes and dynamic diets: The Mesolithic-Neolithic dietary transition in terrestrial central Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science Reports. 22. 444–451. 10 indexed citations

15.

Bickle, Penny, et al.. (2017). The Neolithic of Europe: papers in honour of Alasdair Whittle. Oxbow Books. 15 indexed citations

16.

Denaire, Anthony, Philippe Lefranc, Joachim Wahl, et al.. (2017). The Cultural Project: Formal Chronological Modelling of the Early and Middle Neolithic Sequence in Lower Alsace. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 24(4). 1072–1149. 37 indexed citations

17.

Bickle, Penny, et al.. (2016). At Home in the Neolithic: UnderstandingDiversity in Neolithic Houses and Households. Open Archaeology. 2(1). 4 indexed citations

18.

Bickle, Penny & Linda Fibiger. (2014). Ageing, Childhood and Social Identity in the Early Neolithic of Central Europe. European Journal of Archaeology. 17(2). 208–228. 16 indexed citations

19.

Bickle, Penny & Daniela Hofmann. (2007). Moving on: the contribution of isotope studies to the early Neolithic of Central Europe. Antiquity. 81(314). 1029–1041. 15 indexed citations

20.

Bickle, Penny. (2006). I'm your Venus: making surfaces on the body. 76(9). 257–270.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact