Daniel Ryerson

536 citations
12 papers · 411 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Ryerson

10 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers

Daniel Ryerson
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 76
  • Oncology 126
  • Global and Planetary Change 97
  • Ecology 99
  • Hepatology 30
Replace Lixue Yang with:
Lixue Yang China
Sheri L. Smith United States
Xiao‐Long Lin China
Stephen L. Winter United States
Lihua Meng China
Raquel Garcı́a Spain
Xinxin Zhu China
Jennifer Emery United States
Xiaoping Wei China
Kristen M. Gruenthal United States
Daniel Ryerson relative to Lixue Yang China Lixue Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Lixue Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Ryerson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Ryerson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Ryerson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Ryerson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Ryerson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Ryerson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Ryerson. The network helps show where Daniel Ryerson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Ryerson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Ryerson Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Ryerson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2014111
2 200371
3 201859
4 201851
5 200138
6 201337
7 201228
8 201113
9
Tree-ring reconstruction of western spruce budworm outbreaks in the Rio Grande National Forest, Colorado
19992
10
Pinon pine mortality event in the Southwest: An update for 2005
20081
11 20250
12 20220

About Daniel Ryerson

Daniel Ryerson is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Molecular Biology, Oncology and Insect Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 411 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fire effects on ecosystems (4 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (3 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (3 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (2 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (2 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (2 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (76 citations), Oncology (126 citations), Global and Planetary Change (97 citations), Ecology (99 citations) and Hepatology (30 citations). Daniel Ryerson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Jongsook Kim Kemper, Ann M. Lynch, Thomas W. Swetnam, Robert Parmenter, H. Eric Xu, Byron Kemper, Zhen Xiao, Zachary D. Smith, Xiaoxiao Sun and Sang‐Hoon Kwon. Their work appears in journals such as The EMBO Journal, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Nature Communications, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Eukaryotic Cell.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact