Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Myopia
2020488 citationsEarl Smith, Padmaja Sankaridurg et al.profile →
IMI – Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia
2019310 citationsEarl Smith, Lisa A. Ostrin et al.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Earl Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Earl Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Earl Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Earl Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Earl Smith. The network helps show where Earl Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Earl Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Earl Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Earl Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Earl Smith. Earl Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hattery, Angela J. & Earl Smith. (2021). Policing Black Bodies. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks.3 indexed citations
4.
Hattery, Angela J. & Earl Smith. (2014). Families of Incarcerated African American Men: The Impact on Mothers and Children. The Journal of Pan-African Studies. 7(6). 128.12 indexed citations
5.
Holden, Brien A., Padmaja Sankaridurg, Percy Lazon de la Jara, et al.. (2012). Decreasing Peripheral Hyperopia With Distance-centre Relatively-plus Powered Periphery Contact Lenses Reduced The Rate Of Progress Of Myopia: A 5 Year Vision Crc Study. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 53(14). 6300–6300.6 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Earl & Angela J. Hattery. (2011). Can Social Capital Networks Assist Re-entry Felons to Overcome Barriers to Re-entry and Reduce Recidivism?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Earl, Li‐Fang Hung, & Juan Huang. (2011). Effects of High Ambient Lighting on the Development of Form-Deprivation Myopia in Infant Rhesus Monkeys. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 52(14). 3922–3922.2 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Earl & Angela J. Hattery. (2010). African American Men and the Prison Industrial Complex. The Western journal of black studies. 34(4). 387.16 indexed citations
Smith, Earl & Stephanie L. Witt. (1990). Black Faculty and Affirmative Action at Predominantly White Institutions.. The Western journal of black studies. 14(1). 9–16.16 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Earl. (1983). A comparison of fifth grade students with a professional physical education teacher and a regular teacher. Microform Publications, College of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, University of Oregon eBooks.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.