Deborah Wessels
- Cell Biology top 0.2%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Biophysics top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- David R. SollEdward VossJames A. SpudichMargaret A. TitusWilliam F. LoomisSpencer KuhlJohn W. MurrayKarla J. Daniels
- Topics
- Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (61 papers)3D Printing in Biomedical Research (23 papers)Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (21 papers)
- Cited by
- Cell BiologyBiophysicsAging
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryThe Journal of Cell Biology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Deborah Wessels
84 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Cell Biology 2.5k
- Molecular Biology 1.5k
- Biomedical Engineering 736
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 401
- Biophysics 373
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Wessels
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Wessels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Wessels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Wessels more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Wessels
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Wessels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Wessels. The network helps show where Deborah Wessels may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Wessels
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Wessels. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Wessels based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Wessels. Deborah Wessels is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 32 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 87 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 44 | |
| 15 | 60 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 55 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 131 | |
| 20 | 41 |
About Deborah Wessels
Deborah Wessels is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Aging and Biophysics, having authored 84 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (61 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (23 papers) and Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (2.5k citations), Biophysics (373 citations) and Aging (105 citations). Deborah Wessels has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David R. Soll, Edward Voss, James A. Spudich, Margaret A. Titus, William F. Loomis, Spencer Kuhl, John W. Murray, Karla J. Daniels, David A. Knecht and Jeremy Geiger. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and The Journal of Cell Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.