Daniel R. Marburger
- Education top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Accounting top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Paul L. BurgessJohn F. ScogginsR.R. Peterson
- Topics
- Sports Analytics and Performance (12 papers)Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (12 papers)Sports, Gender, and Society (5 papers)
- Cited by
- EducationGender StudiesAccounting
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Daniel R. Marburger
23 papers receiving 606 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Education 435
- Economics and Econometrics 234
- Accounting 136
- Gender Studies 123
- Sociology and Political Science 123
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel R. Marburger
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel R. Marburger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel R. Marburger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel R. Marburger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel R. Marburger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel R. Marburger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel R. Marburger. The network helps show where Daniel R. Marburger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel R. Marburger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel R. Marburger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel R. Marburger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel R. Marburger. Daniel R. Marburger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Economic Decision Making Using Cost Data A Manager_s Guide | 0 |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Making Managerial Economics Relevant to the MBA | 0 |
| 9 | Is Title IX Really to Blame for the Decline in Intercollegiate Men's Nonrevenue Sports? | 8 |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 219 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 49 | |
| 15 | Stee-Rike Four!: What's Wrong with the Business of Baseball? | 17 |
| 16 | 66 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | Bargaining power and salary structures in major league baseball | 1 |
About Daniel R. Marburger
Daniel R. Marburger is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Accounting and Gender Studies, having authored 28 papers that have together received 724 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports Analytics and Performance (12 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (12 papers) and Sports, Gender, and Society (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (435 citations), Gender Studies (123 citations) and Accounting (136 citations). Daniel R. Marburger has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul L. Burgess, John F. Scoggins and R.R. Peterson. Their work appears in journals such as Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Economics Letters and Southern Economic Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.