Daniel P. King

820 citations
29 papers · 483 indexed · h-index 8

Daniel P. King

21 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers

Daniel P. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Literature and Literary Theory 74
  • Political Science and International Relations 132
  • Sociology and Political Science 200
  • Management Science and Operations Research 47
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 17
Replace Ian Bryant with:
Ian Bryant United Kingdom
Andrew F. Herrmann United States
Kevin Harris United Kingdom
Oliver Wright United Kingdom
Diana Kendall Australia
Nancy Taber Canada
Peter Rule South Africa
James Lindgren United States
Clyde W. Hart United States
Robert V. Labaree United States
Daniel P. King relative to Ian Bryant United Kingdom Ian Bryant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Ian Bryant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel P. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel P. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel P. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel P. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel P. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel P. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel P. King. The network helps show where Daniel P. King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Daniel P. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel P. King Line = papers co-authored together Daniel P. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20045
2 20006
3 199941
4 19987
5 19952
6 19941
7 19931
8 19850
9 19842
10 198263
11 19823
12 19814
13 19781
14 19731
15 1972107
16 19713
17 19700
18 19691
19 1968154
20 19659

About Daniel P. King

Daniel P. King is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Political Science and International Relations, Cultural Studies, Health and History, having authored 29 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American and British Literature Analysis (3 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (1 paper), Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (1 paper), International Law and Human Rights (1 paper), Joseph Conrad and Literature (1 paper), Public-Private Partnership Projects (1 paper) and Islamic Studies and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (74 citations), Political Science and International Relations (132 citations), Sociology and Political Science (200 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (47 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (17 citations). Daniel P. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Arthur Niederhoffer, John C. Ball, Carl D. Chambers, Bernard Crick, Richard de Neufville, Anthony Cronin, Howard Jones, Barry Miles, Harry Benjamin and Thomas J. Kiernan. Their work appears in journals such as World Literature Today, Crime & Delinquency, The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management and The Rangeland Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026