Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
American Federalism: A View from the States.
19671.0k citationsDaniel J. Elazar et al.Midwest Journal of Political Scienceprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Daniel J. Elazar Daniel J. Elazar (= 1×)
peers
Thomas R. Dye
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Elazar
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Elazar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Elazar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Elazar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Elazar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Elazar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Elazar. The network helps show where Daniel J. Elazar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel J. Elazar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel J. Elazar.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel J. Elazar based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel J. Elazar. Daniel J. Elazar is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Elazar, Daniel J.. (2016). Land, State, and Diaspora in the History of the Jewish Polity.1 indexed citations
3.
Elazar, Daniel J.. (2001). Commonwealth : the other road to democracy -- the Swiss model of democratic self-government. Lexington Books.1 indexed citations
4.
Elazar, Daniel J. & John Kincaid. (2000). The covenant connection : from federal theology to modern federalism. Lexington Books.8 indexed citations
Elazar, Daniel J.. (1997). Jewish Communal Structures Around the World. 74(2).2 indexed citations
7.
Elazar, Daniel J.. (1996). Covenant and commonwealth : from Christian separation through the Protestant Reformation.6 indexed citations
8.
Elazar, Daniel J. & Shmuel Sandler. (1992). Who's the boss in Israel : Israel at the polls, 1988-89.2 indexed citations
9.
Elazar, Daniel J.. (1991). Constitutional design and power-sharing in the post-modern epoch. Medical Entomology and Zoology.15 indexed citations
10.
Elazar, Daniel J.. (1990). Israel and the Diaspora: Working Together to Strengthen Jewish Unity and Continuity -- Prospects and Problems. 66(4).1 indexed citations
Elazar, Daniel J.. (1969). Cooperation and conflict : readings in American federalism.10 indexed citations
19.
Grodzins, Morton & Daniel J. Elazar. (1966). The American system : a new view of government in the United States.120 indexed citations
20.
Elazar, Daniel J.. (1965). Constitutional Change in a Long-Depressed Community: A Case Study of Duluth, Minnesota. Digital Well (University of Minnesota Morris). 33(1). 49–66.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.