David Biale
Impact in
- Religious studies top 1%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Demography top 5%
- Jewish Identity and Society
Papers in
-
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 12
- Demography 14
- Jewish Identity and Society 14
- Co-authors
- Michael GalchinskySusannah HeschelMary DouglasDavid VitalR. J. Zwi WerblowskyDaniel J. ElazarBenjamin HarshavDavid Assaf
- Journals
- Jewish Social Studies (6 papers)The American Historical Review (4 papers)Religion Compass (1 paper)Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (1 paper)Journal of Contemporary History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David Biale
27 papers receiving 250 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Religious studies 76
- Demography 103
- Philosophy 95
- Sociology and Political Science 327
- Literature and Literary Theory 45
Countries citing papers authored by David Biale
This map shows the geographic impact of David Biale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Biale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Biale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Biale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Biale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Biale. The network helps show where David Biale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 11 scholars most cited alongside David Biale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 6 | Between Polemics and Apologetics: Jewish Studies in the Age of Multiculturalism | 2016 | 0 |
| 7 | Not in the Heavens: The Tradition of Secular Jewish Thought | 2011 | 1 |
| 8 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 35 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 14 | |
| 15 | Insider/outsider : American Jews and multiculturalism | 1998 | 73 |
| 16 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 27 | |
| 18 | 1982 | 20 | |
| 19 | 1980 | 39 | |
| 20 | Exegesis and Philosophy in the Writings of Abraham Ibn Ezra | 1974 | 0 |
About David Biale
David Biale is a scholar working on Religious studies, Demography, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy and Archeology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 467 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (25 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (14 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (12 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (4 papers), Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity (4 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers), American Jewish Fiction Analysis (2 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (76 citations), Demography (103 citations), Philosophy (95 citations), Sociology and Political Science (327 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (45 citations). David Biale has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Galchinsky, Susannah Heschel, Mary Douglas, David Vital, R. J. Zwi Werblowsky, Daniel J. Elazar, Benjamin Harshav, David Assaf, Samuel C. Heílman and Friedrich Schleiermacher. Their work appears in journals such as Jewish Social Studies, The American Historical Review, Religion Compass, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion and Journal of Contemporary History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.